<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>First Amendment Coalition &#187; free press</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/tag/free-press/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org</link>
	<description>Defending Your Freedom of Speech &#38; Right to Know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:00:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>With reporting costs escalating, will media cut coverage of Newt Gingrich?</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/with-reporting-costs-escalating-will-media-cut-coverage-of-newt-gingrich/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/with-reporting-costs-escalating-will-media-cut-coverage-of-newt-gingrich/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buzzfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
With travel costs eating up the budgets of the big media companies, they will look to save money by ending man-to-man coverage of also rans including Newt Gingrich, predicts John Ellis of BuzzFeed.-db From a commentary in BuzzFeed, January  31, 2012, by John Ellis. Full story &#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>With travel costs eating up the budgets of the big media companies, they will look to save money by ending man-to-man coverage of also rans including Newt Gingrich, predicts John Ellis of <em>BuzzFeed</em>.-db</p>
<p>From a commentary in <strong><em></em><em>BuzzFeed</em></strong>, January  31, 2012, by John Ellis.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/johnellis/big-media-is-about-to-pull-the-plug-on-gingrich-515s" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.buzzfeed.com/johnellis/big-media-is-about-to-pull-the-plug-on-gingrich-515s?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/with-reporting-costs-escalating-will-media-cut-coverage-of-newt-gingrich/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reporters group disappointed in federal appeals court decision over access to Virginia state records</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/reporters-group-disappointed-in-federal-appeals-court-decision-over-access-to-virginia-state-records/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/reporters-group-disappointed-in-federal-appeals-court-decision-over-access-to-virginia-state-records/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access to Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunshine Ordinances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McBurney v. Young]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCFOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VFOIA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The Reporters Committee  for Freedom of the Press did not like a federal appeals decision upholding a law restricting access to Virginia state records by non-residents. The court ruled that the restriction was not unconstitutional. The Reporters Committee felt the court should have considered the effect of the restriction on smaller journalistic enterprises. -db From [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The Reporters Committee  for Freedom of the Press did not like a federal appeals decision upholding a law restricting access to Virginia state records by non-residents. The court ruled that the restriction was not unconstitutional.</p>
<p>The Reporters Committee felt the court should have considered the effect of the restriction on smaller journalistic enterprises. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary by<em><strong> The Reporters Committee  for Freedom of the Press</strong></em>, February 1, 2012.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rcfp.org/reporters-committee-surprised-decision-restricting-va-government-info-residents" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.rcfp.org/reporters-committee-surprised-decision-restricting-va-government-info-residents?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/reporters-group-disappointed-in-federal-appeals-court-decision-over-access-to-virginia-state-records/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal court rules non-residents can be denied Virginia state records</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/federal-court-rules-non-residents-can-be-denied-virginia-state-records/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/federal-court-rules-non-residents-can-be-denied-virginia-state-records/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access to Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dormant commerce clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interstate commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public's right to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCFOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VFOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that non-residents have no right to Virginia public records under the state&#8217;s freedom of information law. Non-residents were challenging the law claiming it was unconstitutional. The two non-residents who sued the state were seeking child support documents and real estate tax assessment records. -db From The Reporters [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that non-residents have no right to Virginia public records under the state&#8217;s freedom of information law. Non-residents were challenging the law claiming it was unconstitutional.</p>
<p>The two non-residents who sued the state were seeking child support documents and real estate tax assessment records. -db</p>
<p>From <strong><em>The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press</em></strong>, February 1, 2012, by You-Jin Han.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rcfp.org/browse-media-law-resources/news/appeals-court-restricts-records-access-non-virginians" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.rcfp.org/browse-media-law-resources/news/appeals-court-restricts-records-access-non-virginians?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/federal-court-rules-non-residents-can-be-denied-virginia-state-records/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Journalists snared in arrest net at Occupy Oakland protests</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/journalists-snared-in-arrest-net-at-occupy-oakland-protests/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/journalists-snared-in-arrest-net-at-occupy-oakland-protests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrests of journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vandalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
Six journalists were arrested at an Occupy Oakland protest at Oakland City Hall where protesters broke in and vandalized the walls. That brings the total of journalists arrested during the protests to 52. The reporters included those from KGO, an ABC affiliate, Mother Jones and the San Francisco Chronicle. As of now, it is not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>Six journalists were arrested at an Occupy Oakland protest at Oakland City Hall where protesters broke in and vandalized the walls. That brings the total of journalists arrested during the protests to 52.</p>
<p>The reporters included those from <em>KGO</em>, an<em> ABC</em> affiliate, <em>Mother Jones</em> and the <em>San Francisco Chronicle</em>. As of now, it is not known why they were arrested. -db</p>
<p>From <strong><em>The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press</em></strong>, January 30, 2012, by Rachel Bunn.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rcfp.org/browse-media-law-resources/news/six-journalists-arrested-occupy-oakland" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.rcfp.org/browse-media-law-resources/news/six-journalists-arrested-occupy-oakland?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/journalists-snared-in-arrest-net-at-occupy-oakland-protests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Family sues Hustler for $20 million for publishing nude photos after death</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/family-sues-hustler-for-20-million-for-publishing-nude-photos-after-her-death/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/family-sues-hustler-for-20-million-for-publishing-nude-photos-after-her-death/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newsworthy figure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public figure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Wrestling Entertainment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
A grieving family is suing Hustler Magazine for $20 million after the magazine published nude photos of a model who was murdered by her husband. Hustler is claiming that the model was a public figure and newsworthy. -db From the  Daily Mail, January 26, 2012, by Daily Mail Reporter. Full story &#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>A grieving family is suing <em>Hustler Magazine</em> for $20 million after the magazine published nude photos of a model who was murdered by her husband.</p>
<p><em>Hustler</em> is claiming that the model was a public figure and newsworthy. -db</p>
<p>From the  <strong><em>Daily Mail</em></strong>, January 26, 2012, by <em>Daily Mail</em> Reporter.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2091891/Family-appeals-20M-verdict-Hustler-magazine-published-nude-photos-Nancy-Benoit-murdered-wrestler-husband.html?ITO=1490" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2091891/Family-appeals-20M-verdict-Hustler-magazine-published-nude-photos-Nancy-Benoit-murdered-wrestler-husband.html?ITO=1490&amp;referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/family-sues-hustler-for-20-million-for-publishing-nude-photos-after-her-death/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prosecutors seeking testimony of New York Times reporter in national security trial</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/prosecutors-seeking-testimony-of-new-york-times-reporter-in-national-security-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/prosecutors-seeking-testimony-of-new-york-times-reporter-in-national-security-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Battlefield Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Risen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeffrey Sterling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reporter's privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Truthdig.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war on terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
Prosecutors in the case of a former CIA officer Jeffrey Sterling accused of leaking classified information are attempting to reverse a lower court finding that a New York Times reporter James Risen was exempt from disclosing his sources for a story on a CIA program to disrupt Iran&#8217;s nuclear program. The government prosecutors claim that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>Prosecutors in the case of a former CIA officer Jeffrey Sterling accused of leaking classified information are attempting to reverse a lower court finding that a <em>New York Times</em> reporter James Risen was exempt from disclosing his sources for a story on a CIA program to disrupt Iran&#8217;s nuclear program.</p>
<p>The government prosecutors claim that there is no right for reporters to withhold identities of sources in criminal cases. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary in <strong><em>Secrecy News</em></strong>, January 17, 2012, by Steven Aftergood.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2012/01/sterling_appeal_brief.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2012/01/sterling_appeal_brief.html?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/prosecutors-seeking-testimony-of-new-york-times-reporter-in-national-security-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reporter sues Obama over law he claims threatens free press</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/reporter-sues-obama-over-law-he-claims-threatens-free-press/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/reporter-sues-obama-over-law-he-claims-threatens-free-press/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Battlefield Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Truthdig.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war on terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
A reporter has sued President Barack Obama saying that under the Homeland Battlefield Bill reporters simply doing their job could be thrown in jail without due process. Signed into law last December 31, the bill authorizes the military to indefinitely detain without charge or trial anyone accused of supporting terrorists anywhere in the world. -db [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>A reporter has sued President Barack Obama saying that under the Homeland Battlefield Bill reporters simply doing their job could be thrown in jail without due process.</p>
<p>Signed into law last December 31, the bill authorizes the military to indefinitely detain without charge or trial anyone accused of supporting terrorists anywhere in the world. -db</p>
<p>From the <strong><em>Courthouse News Service</em></strong>, January 17, 2012, by Adam Klaasfeld.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/01/17/43099.htm" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.courthousenews.com/2012/01/17/43099.htm?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/reporter-sues-obama-over-law-he-claims-threatens-free-press/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indiana high school newspaper adviser sues over suspension</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/indiana-high-school-newspaper-adviser-sues-over-suspension/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/indiana-high-school-newspaper-adviser-sues-over-suspension/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prior review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholastic press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPLC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
An Indiana journalism adviser sued the Greater Clark County Schools claiming the the high school&#8217;s administrators were suspending her for her support of student&#8217;s First Amendment rights. The school suspended her claiming that in 2008 she had mismanaged the yearbook, but the adviser said the suspension came after the administrators objected to stories about security [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>An Indiana journalism adviser sued the Greater Clark County Schools claiming the the high school&#8217;s administrators were suspending her for her support of student&#8217;s First Amendment rights.</p>
<p>The school suspended her claiming that in 2008 she had mismanaged the yearbook, but the adviser said the suspension came after the administrators objected to stories about security cameras and student discipline and tried to install prior review which she opposed. -db</p>
<p>From the <strong><em>Student Press Law Center</em></strong>, January 5, 2012, by Brian Schraum with contributions from Emily Gerston.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.splc.org/news/newsflash.asp?id=2312" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.splc.org/news/newsflash.asp?id=2312&amp;referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/indiana-high-school-newspaper-adviser-sues-over-suspension/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rights of Reporters Covering Protests? The Nation answers FAQs</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/rights-of-reporters-covering-protests-the-nation-answers-faqs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/rights-of-reporters-covering-protests-the-nation-answers-faqs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 19:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FAC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reporters' rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
How does the First Amendment protect reporters on the OWS protest frontlines?  Attorney and University of Missouri Journalism Fellow Jonathan Peters spells it out in The Nation: FAQ: What Are the Rights of Reporters Covering Protests? &#124; The Nation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>How does the First Amendment protect reporters on the OWS protest frontlines?  Attorney and University of Missouri Journalism Fellow Jonathan Peters spells it out in <em>The Nation:</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.thenation.com/article/165453/faq-what-are-rights-reporters-covering-protests" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.thenation.com/article/165453/faq-what-are-rights-reporters-covering-protests?referer=');">FAQ: What Are the Rights of Reporters Covering Protests? | The Nation</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/rights-of-reporters-covering-protests-the-nation-answers-faqs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Journalist&#8217;s arrest serious blow to democracy in Turkey</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/journalists-arrest-serious-blow-to-democracy-in-turkey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/journalists-arrest-serious-blow-to-democracy-in-turkey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 20:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erdrogan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Human Rights Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nedim Sener]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Army of Imam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
A Turkish investigative reporter was arrested on charges of plotting to overthrow the government. Ironically, he had been investigating the plot only a year earlier. Human rights groups say the government is trying to silence critics with a campaign that puts the government&#8217;s commitment to democracy in question. -db From The New York Times, January [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>A Turkish investigative reporter was arrested on charges of plotting to overthrow the government. Ironically, he had been investigating the plot only a year earlier.</p>
<p>Human rights groups say the government is trying to silence critics with a campaign that puts the government&#8217;s commitment to democracy in question. -db</p>
<p>From <strong><em>The New York Times</em></strong>, January 5, 2012, by Dan Bilefsky and Sebnem Arsu.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/05/world/europe/turkeys-glow-dims-as-government-limits-free-speech.html?_r=2&amp;partner=rss&amp;emc=rss" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.nytimes.com/2012/01/05/world/europe/turkeys-glow-dims-as-government-limits-free-speech.html?_r=2_amp_partner=rss_amp_emc=rss&amp;referer=');">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/journalists-arrest-serious-blow-to-democracy-in-turkey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brooklyn: Police arrest Occupy Wall Street livestream operators</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/brooklyn-police-arrest-occupy-wall-street-livestream-operators/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/brooklyn-police-arrest-occupy-wall-street-livestream-operators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 19:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health and safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[livestreaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defense Authorization Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street protests]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
Police entered the offices of Global Revolution that runs livestream on Occupy Wall Street and arrested six of its operators on Monday effectively shutting down the site which had aggregated livestreaming of Occupy Wall Street worldwide. The arrests were made because the six were living in the offices and refused to honor an order to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>Police entered the offices of Global Revolution that runs livestream on Occupy Wall Street and arrested six of its operators on Monday effectively shutting down the site which had aggregated livestreaming of Occupy Wall Street worldwide.</p>
<p>The arrests were made because the six were living in the offices and refused to honor an order to vacate since the premises were deemed by authorities &#8220;imminently perilous to life.&#8221; -db</p>
<p>From <strong><em>The Atlantic Wire</em></strong>, January 3, 2012, by Adam Martin.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2012/01/occupy-wall-streets-livestream-operators-arrested/46921/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2012/01/occupy-wall-streets-livestream-operators-arrested/46921/?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/brooklyn-police-arrest-occupy-wall-street-livestream-operators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California: Anaheim looking into order to purge records</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/california-anaheim-looking-into-order-to-purge-records/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/california-anaheim-looking-into-order-to-purge-records/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access to Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunshine Ordinances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[destroying public records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The Anaheim City Attorney is investigating an e-mail sent by a planning department official ordering employees to purge unnecessary records at the risk of disciplinary action. The order came after the Voice of OC filed a California Public Records Act request for communications to and from city council members. -db From the Voice of OC, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The Anaheim City Attorney is investigating an e-mail sent by a planning department official ordering employees to purge unnecessary records at the risk of disciplinary action.</p>
<p>The order came after the<em> Voice of OC</em> filed a California Public Records Act request for communications to and from city council members. -db</p>
<p>From the <strong><em>Voice of OC</em></strong>, January 4, 2012, by Adam Elmahrek.</p>
<p><a href="http://voiceofoc.org/countywide/this_just_in/article_5dc541e8-36e9-11e1-a74a-001871e3ce6c.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/voiceofoc.org/countywide/this_just_in/article_5dc541e8-36e9-11e1-a74a-001871e3ce6c.html?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/california-anaheim-looking-into-order-to-purge-records/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Missouri: Federal appeals court rules reporter&#8217;s testimony should be allowed</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/federal-appeals-court-rules-reporters-testimony-should-be-allowed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/federal-appeals-court-rules-reporters-testimony-should-be-allowed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[punitive damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reporter's privilege]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The 8th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that a court could force a reporter to testify in a lawsuit against plastic surgeons. A woman brought the lawsuit against her plastic surgeons who gave her partially nude photos to  the reporter who worked for a Missouri newspaper. -db From The Reporters Committee for Freedom of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The 8th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that a court could force a reporter to testify in a lawsuit against plastic surgeons.</p>
<p>A woman brought the lawsuit against her plastic surgeons who gave her partially nude photos to  the reporter who worked for a Missouri newspaper. -db</p>
<p>From <strong><em>The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press</em></strong>, January 4, 2012, by Chris Healy.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rcfp.org/browse-media-law-resources/news/reporters-testimony-wrongly-excluded-eighth-circuit-rules" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.rcfp.org/browse-media-law-resources/news/reporters-testimony-wrongly-excluded-eighth-circuit-rules?referer=');">Full story </a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/federal-appeals-court-rules-reporters-testimony-should-be-allowed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawyer for &#8216;tough sheriff&#8217; loses round in federal appeals court on charges of muzzling newspaper</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/lawyer-for-tough-sheriff-loses-round-in-federal-appeals-court-on-charges-of-muzzling-newspaper/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/lawyer-for-tough-sheriff-loses-round-in-federal-appeals-court-on-charges-of-muzzling-newspaper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conspiracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immunity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals was unimpressed with the lawyer of Sheriff Joe Arpaio, trashing her argument that the sheriff was not liable under the First Amendment for his attacks on The Phoenix New Times. The lawyer failed to recognize that their appeal vacated an earlier opinion setting aside an argument about conspiracy. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals was unimpressed with the lawyer of Sheriff Joe Arpaio, trashing her argument that the sheriff was not liable under the First Amendment for his attacks on <em>The Phoenix New Times</em>.</p>
<p>The lawyer failed to recognize that their appeal vacated an earlier opinion setting aside an argument about conspiracy. The lawyer was unprepared to answer the court&#8217;s questions concerning that issue. -db</p>
<p>From the  <strong><em>Courthouse News Service</em></strong>, December 16, 2011, by David Tartre.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/12/16/42326.htm" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.courthousenews.com/2011/12/16/42326.htm?referer=');">Full story </a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/lawyer-for-tough-sheriff-loses-round-in-federal-appeals-court-on-charges-of-muzzling-newspaper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Tough sheriff&#8217; takes pounding before federal appeals court in newspaper case</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/tough-sheriff-takes-pounding-before-federal-appeals-court-in-newspaper-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/tough-sheriff-takes-pounding-before-federal-appeals-court-in-newspaper-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 18:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bogus charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grand jury statute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intimidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subpoenas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
In a suit alleging that Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio arrested two Phoenix newspaper executives on false charges in retaliation for unflattering coverage in the newspapers, Arpaio&#8217;s lawyer came under tough questioning. One of the key questions is whether the sheriff himself authorized the arrest of the publishers under subpoenas which  were never approved by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>In a suit alleging that Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio arrested two Phoenix newspaper executives on false charges in retaliation for unflattering coverage in the newspapers, Arpaio&#8217;s lawyer came under tough questioning.</p>
<p>One of the key questions is whether the sheriff himself authorized the arrest of the publishers under subpoenas which  were never approved by a grand jury. -db</p>
<p>From <strong><em>The Recorder</em></strong>, December 14, 2011,  by Kate Moser.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/ca/PubArticleCA.jsp?id=1202535662413&amp;slreturn=1" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.law.com/jsp/ca/PubArticleCA.jsp?id=1202535662413_amp_slreturn=1&amp;referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/tough-sheriff-takes-pounding-before-federal-appeals-court-in-newspaper-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chicago federal judge no longer asking for reporters&#8217; notes</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/chicago-federal-judge-no-longer-asking-for-reporters-notes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/chicago-federal-judge-no-longer-asking-for-reporters-notes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 18:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reporters notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPJ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
A U.S. district judge is no longer asking Chicago reporters to provide notes of interviews with a juror who did not admit to two felony convictions in filling out court papers prior to serving in a high profile trial. The trial concerned a charge that a man tried to extort money from a film producer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>A U.S. district judge is no longer asking Chicago reporters to provide notes of interviews with a juror who did not admit to two felony convictions in filling out court papers prior to serving in a high profile trial.</p>
<p>The trial concerned a charge that a man tried to extort money from a film producer trying to buy a share of the state Teacher Retirement System pension fund. -db</p>
<p>From the <strong><em>Chicago Sun-Times</em></strong>, December 15, 2011, by Abdon M. Pallasch.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.suntimes.com/9442050-417/reporters-wont-have-to-testify-turn-over-notes-in-cellini-case.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.suntimes.com/9442050-417/reporters-wont-have-to-testify-turn-over-notes-in-cellini-case.html?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/chicago-federal-judge-no-longer-asking-for-reporters-notes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sex scandal: Gannett newspaper in Ohio must face defamation lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/sex-scandal-gannett-newspaper-in-ohio-must-face-defamation-lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/sex-scandal-gannett-newspaper-in-ohio-must-face-defamation-lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 20:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair report statue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gannett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex on the job]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[truth as a defense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The Milford-Miami Advertiser must defend itself in court in a defamation claim over an article it ran that a police officer &#8220;had sex with a woman while on the job.&#8221; The reference was to allegations 13 years before a current sex scandal investigation. Even though he was fired for various other offenses, the officer said [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The Milford-Miami Advertiser must defend itself in court in a defamation claim over an article it ran that a police officer &#8220;had sex with a woman while on the job.&#8221; The reference was to allegations 13 years before a current sex scandal investigation.</p>
<p>Even though he was fired for various other offenses, the officer said it was never substantiated that he had sex with anyone while on duty and was reinstated as a police officer. -db</p>
<p>From the <strong><em>Courthouse News Service</em></strong>, December 13, 2011, by Kevin Koeninger.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/12/13/42194.htm" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.courthousenews.com/2011/12/13/42194.htm?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/sex-scandal-gannett-newspaper-in-ohio-must-face-defamation-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal judge orders Chicago Tribune reporter to turn over notes</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/federal-judge-orders-chicago-tribune-reporter-to-turn-over-notes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/federal-judge-orders-chicago-tribune-reporter-to-turn-over-notes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disclosing notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The Chicago Tribune is deciding its course of action after a federal judge ordered thier reporter to turn over notes and other document in the case of a juror who concealed her criminal record in the William Cellini trial. Cellini was convicted last month for attempted extortion. The Tribune suggested that the court should first [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The <em>Chicago Tribune</em> is deciding its course of action after a federal judge ordered thier reporter to turn over notes and other document in the case of a juror who concealed her criminal record in the William Cellini trial.</p>
<p>Cellini was convicted last month for attempted extortion. The <em>Tribune</em> suggested that the court should first question the woman&#8217;s fellow jurors, family and other close associates. -db</p>
<p>From the <strong><em>Chicago Tribune</em></strong>, December 13, 2011, by Stacy St. Clair.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/ct-met-cellini-subpoena-20111213,0,5334981.story" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/ct-met-cellini-subpoena-20111213_0_5334981.story?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/federal-judge-orders-chicago-tribune-reporter-to-turn-over-notes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California: Desert Hot Springs contractor sues for defamation</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/california-desert-contractor-sues-for-defamation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/california-desert-contractor-sues-for-defamation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 20:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KNEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smear campaign]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
A  Desert Hot Springs contractor claims that a KNEWS talk show host defamed him. The contractor said the host depicted him as a wanted felon who collected child pornography. The contractor was convicted for writing a bad check in 2008 but says the current allegations against him were false, invaded his privacy, brought his children [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>A  Desert Hot Springs contractor claims that a KNEWS talk show host defamed him. The contractor said the host depicted him as a wanted felon who collected child pornography.</p>
<p>The contractor was convicted for writing a bad check in 2008 but says the current allegations against him were false, invaded his privacy, brought his children ridicule  and ruined his business. The station said it broadcast true information in the public interest. -db</p>
<p>From <strong><em>The Desert Sun</em></strong>, December 10, 2011, by Kate McGinty.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mydesert.com/article/20111210/NEWS01/112100313/Lee-Rayburn-named-Chryss-defamation-suit" class="broken_link" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.mydesert.com/article/20111210/NEWS01/112100313/Lee-Rayburn-named-Chryss-defamation-suit?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/california-desert-contractor-sues-for-defamation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York Times columnist taken into police custody in Bahrain</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/new-york-times-columnist-taken-into-policy-custody-in-bahrain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/new-york-times-columnist-taken-into-policy-custody-in-bahrain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 19:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bahrain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The New York Times columnist Nick Kristof and his collegue were tear-gassed and taken into custody by Bahraini police during a protest in Sitra. The police said the detention was for Kristof&#8217;s own good. Kristof has been critical of the Bahraini government. -db From The Wrap,  December 9, 2011, by Lucas Shaw. Full story]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p><em>The New York Times</em> columnist Nick Kristof and his collegue were tear-gassed and taken into custody by Bahraini police during a protest in Sitra.</p>
<p>The police said the detention was for Kristof&#8217;s own good. Kristof has been critical of the Bahraini government. -db</p>
<p>From <strong><em>The Wrap</em></strong>,  December 9, 2011, by Lucas Shaw.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thewrap.com/media/column-post/ny-times-columnist-videographer-teargassed-bahrain-33487" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.thewrap.com/media/column-post/ny-times-columnist-videographer-teargassed-bahrain-33487?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/new-york-times-columnist-taken-into-policy-custody-in-bahrain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opinion: Columnist says Oregon blogger got justice in loss of defamation suit</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/opinion-columnist-says-oregon-blogger-got-justice-in-loss-of-defamation-suit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/opinion-columnist-says-oregon-blogger-got-justice-in-loss-of-defamation-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 19:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[llibel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shield laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
In ruling against an Oregon blogger who lost a $2.5 million defamation suit, a federal judge refused to grant the woman standing as a journalist. Writing for The New York Times, David Carr argued that in examining the facts, he found that the blogger had mounted a scurrilous campaign of  lies to ruin a lawyer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>In ruling against an Oregon blogger who lost a $2.5 million defamation suit, a federal judge refused to grant the woman standing as a journalist.</p>
<p>Writing for <em>The New York Times</em>, David Carr argued that in examining the facts, he found that the blogger had mounted a scurrilous campaign of  lies to ruin a lawyer and his business, the Obsidian Finance Group. None of what she reported, that the lawyer committed tax fraud and was a thief and thug was ever collaborated says Carr. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary in <strong><em>The New York Times</em></strong>, December 11, 2011, by David Carr.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/12/business/media/when-truth-survives-free-speech.html?_r=1&amp;ref=busine" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.nytimes.com/2011/12/12/business/media/when-truth-survives-free-speech.html?_r=1_amp_ref=busine&amp;referer=');">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/opinion-columnist-says-oregon-blogger-got-justice-in-loss-of-defamation-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposed campaign spending law would restrict media from endorsing candidates</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/proposed-campaign-spending-law-would-restrict-media-from-endorsing-candidates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/proposed-campaign-spending-law-would-restrict-media-from-endorsing-candidates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 18:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporation spending elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restriction campaign expenditures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
In attempting to regulate spending of corporations on political campaigns and candidates, legislation introduced in Congress would eliminate newspaper editorials about candidates or ballot measures, writes Eugene Volokh in The Volokh Conspiracy. Intended as an amendment to the U.S. Constitution, the law would restrict newspapers and media businesses organized as for-profit corporations from spending money [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>In attempting to regulate spending of corporations on political campaigns and candidates, legislation introduced in Congress would eliminate newspaper editorials about candidates or ballot measures, writes Eugene Volokh in <em>The Volokh Conspiracy</em>.</p>
<p>Intended as an amendment to the U.S. Constitution, the law would restrict newspapers and media businesses organized as for-profit corporations from spending money to publish or broadcast anything that would have the purpose of electing a candidate or passing a ballot measure. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary in <strong><em>The Volokh Conspiracy</em></strong>, December 9, 2011, by Eugene Volokh.</p>
<p><a href="http://volokh.com/2011/12/09/congressional-bill-would-ban-editorials-about-candidates-or-ballot-measures-by-nearly-all-newspapers/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/volokh.com/2011/12/09/congressional-bill-would-ban-editorials-about-candidates-or-ballot-measures-by-nearly-all-newspapers/?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/proposed-campaign-spending-law-would-restrict-media-from-endorsing-candidates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State Department still says cables WikiLeaks released last year are classified</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/state-department-still-says-cables-wikileaks-released-last-year-are-classified/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/state-department-still-says-cables-wikileaks-released-last-year-are-classified/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 18:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal FOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanomo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rendition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secrecy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The Obama administration is still insisting that cables WikiLeaks released last year are classified even though the cables were released by the State Department in compliance with a Freedom of Information Act request. The classified information concerned targeted killings, detention at Guantanamo, torture and rendition. -db From a commentary for the American Civil Liberties Union, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The Obama administration is still insisting that cables WikiLeaks released last year are classified even though the cables were released by the State Department in compliance with a Freedom of Information Act request.</p>
<p>The classified information concerned targeted killings, detention at Guantanamo, torture and rendition. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary for the <strong><em>American Civil Liberties Union</em></strong>, December 7, 2011, by Nathan Freed Wessler and Anna Estevao.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security/secrecy-without-sense-state-department-censors-cables-already-published" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.aclu.org/blog/national-security/secrecy-without-sense-state-department-censors-cables-already-published?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/state-department-still-says-cables-wikileaks-released-last-year-are-classified/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Journalist group president calls for stop to arrests of journalists at Occupy sites</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/journalist-group-president-calls-for-stop-to-arrests-of-journalists-at-occupy-sites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/journalist-group-president-calls-for-stop-to-arrests-of-journalists-at-occupy-sites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 19:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrests of journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy demonstrations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reporters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPJ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The president of the Society of Professional Journalists called for the end of the &#8220;alarming trend&#8221; of the arrests of journalists at Occupy demonstrations. John C. Ensslin said he covered the crime beat and that his brother was a police officer and so that he understands the difficult situations confonting police. He proposes that both [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The president of the <em>Society of Professional Journalists</em> called for the end of the &#8220;alarming trend&#8221; of the arrests of journalists at Occupy demonstrations. John C. Ensslin said he covered the crime beat and that his brother was a police officer and so that he understands the difficult situations confonting police.</p>
<p>He proposes that both reporters and law enforcement official own up to mistakes made in the field and that authorities drop charges against reporters who were only doing their jobs. Ensslin also offered to set up forums with reporters and city officials to exchange views on the arrests. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary for the <strong><em>Society of Professional Journalist</em><em>s</em></strong>, by John C. Ensslin.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.spj.org/news.asp?REF=1092#1092" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.spj.org/news.asp?REF=1092_1092&amp;referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/journalist-group-president-calls-for-stop-to-arrests-of-journalists-at-occupy-sites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ruled not a journalist, Oregon blogger loses $2.5 million defamation suit in federal court</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/ruled-not-a-journalist-blogger-loses-2-5-million-defamation-suit-in-federal-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/ruled-not-a-journalist-blogger-loses-2-5-million-defamation-suit-in-federal-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 19:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definition of journalist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law and courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon shield law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
A blogger who wrote critical articles about an investment firm lost a $2.5 million defamation suit to the firm after an U.S. District Court judge ruled that she was not a journalist so not under the protection of the Oregon media shield law. She could not therefore withhold the identity of a source needed to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>A blogger who wrote critical articles about an investment firm lost a $2.5 million defamation suit to the firm after an U.S. District Court judge ruled that she was not a journalist so not under the protection of the Oregon media shield law. She could not therefore withhold the identity of a source needed to verify the one statement that the judge found libelous. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary in <strong><em>Seattle Weekly</em></strong>, December 6, 2011, by Curtis Cartier.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.seattleweekly.com/dailyweekly/2011/12/crystal_cox_oregon_blogger_isn.php" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/blogs.seattleweekly.com/dailyweekly/2011/12/crystal_cox_oregon_blogger_isn.php?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/ruled-not-a-journalist-blogger-loses-2-5-million-defamation-suit-in-federal-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reporter held blameless in sex abuse case suicide</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/reporter-held-blameless-in-sex-abuse-case-suicide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/reporter-held-blameless-in-sex-abuse-case-suicide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 18:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual assault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suicide]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
A Lousiana state appeals court ruled that a reporter with KNOE-TV was not liable for the suicide of a blind man who allegedly committed a sexual assault against a blind student. The reporter had reported that the alleged crime was under investigation and named the accused. -db From the Courthouse News Service, December 6, 2011, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>A Lousiana state appeals court ruled that a reporter with KNOE-TV was not liable for the suicide of a blind man who allegedly committed a sexual assault against a blind student. The reporter had reported that the alleged crime was under investigation and named the accused. -db</p>
<p>From the <strong><em>Courthouse News Service</em></strong>, December 6, 2011, by Jeff D. Gorman.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/12/06/42000.htm" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.courthousenews.com/2011/12/06/42000.htm?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/reporter-held-blameless-in-sex-abuse-case-suicide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California: Restrictions on First Amendment debated in two Sacramento cases</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/california-restrictions-on-first-amendment-debated-in-two-sacramento-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/california-restrictions-on-first-amendment-debated-in-two-sacramento-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access to courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[curfew laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[place and manner restrictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sacramento Bee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
A Sacramento lawyer found herself in court the same day  arguing two sides of the First Amendment in two separate trials, in one to keep the press and public out of pretrail hearings in a sensational murder trial and the other to defend Occupy Sacramento protesters on free speech grounds. In both trials she was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>A Sacramento lawyer found herself in court the same day  arguing two sides of the First Amendment in two separate trials, in one to keep the press and public out of pretrail hearings in a sensational murder trial and the other to defend Occupy Sacramento protesters on free speech grounds.</p>
<p>In both trials she was arguing&#8221;time, place and manner&#8221; restrictions on free speech and/or press. -db</p>
<p>From the <strong><em>Sacramento Bee</em></strong>,  December  4, 2011, by Andy  Furillo.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sacbee.com/2011/12/03/4096532/two-diverse-cases-in-sacramento.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.sacbee.com/2011/12/03/4096532/two-diverse-cases-in-sacramento.html?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/california-restrictions-on-first-amendment-debated-in-two-sacramento-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California: Federal court bows out of free press case involving access to Ventura court documents</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/california-federal-court-bows-out-of-free-press-case-involving-access-to-ventura-court-documents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/california-federal-court-bows-out-of-free-press-case-involving-access-to-ventura-court-documents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 18:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access to Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access to courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Court Case Management System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courthouse News Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The Courthouse News Service lost a round in court when a federal judge refused to hear a case over a court clerk&#8217;s delay in providing access to new civil actions. Courthouse News contended that the delays violated their free press rights in that by the time they received access, the cases were old news. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The <em>Courthouse News Service</em> lost a round in court when a federal judge refused to hear a case over a court clerk&#8217;s delay in providing access to new civil actions. <em>Courthouse News </em>contended that the delays violated their free press rights in that by the time they received access, the cases were old news.</p>
<p>The judge said it was not the role of a federal judge to intervene in a state court&#8217;s business. -db</p>
<p>From the <strong><em>Courthouse News Service</em></strong>, November 29, 2011, by Bill Girdner.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/11/29/41788.htm" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.courthousenews.com/2011/11/29/41788.htm?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/california-federal-court-bows-out-of-free-press-case-involving-access-to-ventura-court-documents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opinion: Righthaven overstepped but protection for newspapers still vital</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/opinion-righthaven-overstepped-but-protection-for-newspapers-still-vital/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/opinion-righthaven-overstepped-but-protection-for-newspapers-still-vital/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 19:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright troll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EFF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Righthaven]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
Righthaven&#8217;s methods in pursuing copyright violations turned out to be bogus and unfair resulting in its bankruptcy, but, says Jeffrey D. Neuburger in MediaShift, it would be too bad if the company did not survive long enough to pursue appeals lest newspapers lose ground in receiving just compensation for their work. -db From a commentary [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>Righthaven&#8217;s methods in pursuing copyright violations turned out to be bogus and unfair resulting in its bankruptcy, but, says Jeffrey D. Neuburger in <em>MediaShift</em>, it would be too bad if the company did not survive long enough to pursue appeals lest newspapers lose ground in receiving just compensation for their work. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary for <strong><em>MediaShift</em></strong>, December 1, 2011, by Jeffrey D. Neuburger.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2011/12/copyright-infringement-defendants-turn-the-table-on-righthaven335.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.pbs.org/mediashift/2011/12/copyright-infringement-defendants-turn-the-table-on-righthaven335.html?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/opinion-righthaven-overstepped-but-protection-for-newspapers-still-vital/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tennessee airport loses fight to ban newspaper racks</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/tennessee-airport-loses-fight-to-ban-newspaper-racks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/tennessee-airport-loses-fight-to-ban-newspaper-racks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper racks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RDU]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
After dropping nearly a million dollars in legal bills, the Raleigh-Durham International Airport came to an agreement with the newspapers  to allow coin-operated newspaper vending boxes back into the airport. A federal district court had ruled that the ban on news racks violated the First Amendment. -db From the News Observer, November 26, 2011, by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>After dropping nearly a million dollars in legal bills, the Raleigh-Durham International Airport came to an agreement with the newspapers  to allow coin-operated newspaper vending boxes back into the airport.</p>
<p>A federal district court had ruled that the ban on news racks violated the First Amendment. -db</p>
<p>From the <strong><em>News Observer</em></strong>, November 26, 2011, by Bruce Siceloff.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newsobserver.com/2011/11/26/1671345/after-losing-court-battle-rdu.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.newsobserver.com/2011/11/26/1671345/after-losing-court-battle-rdu.html?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/tennessee-airport-loses-fight-to-ban-newspaper-racks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opinion: WikiLeaks made significant contributions to the right to know</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/opinion-wikileaks-made-significant-contributions-to-the-right-to-know/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/opinion-wikileaks-made-significant-contributions-to-the-right-to-know/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 19:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Espionage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of infomation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mainstream media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
WikiLeaks has changed the face of journalism and contributed more scoops this year than any other media outlet, reports Trevor Timm in a commentary for the Electronic Frontier Foundation. In using the Espionage Act to prosecute WikiLeaks, the federal government poses a real threat to the mainsream media and the First Amendment, argues Timm. -db [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>WikiLeaks has changed the face of journalism and contributed more scoops this year than any other media outlet, reports Trevor Timm in a commentary for the <em>Electronic Frontier Foundation</em>.</p>
<p>In using the Espionage Act to prosecute WikiLeaks, the federal government poses a real threat to the mainsream media and the First Amendment, argues Timm. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary for the <strong><em>Electronic Frontier Foundation</em></strong>, November 28, 2011, by Trevor Timm.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/11/cablegate-one-year-later-how-wikileaks-has-influenced-foreign-policy-journalism" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/11/cablegate-one-year-later-how-wikileaks-has-influenced-foreign-policy-journalism?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/opinion-wikileaks-made-significant-contributions-to-the-right-to-know/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Police block, rough up, arrest journalists covering clearing of Occupy Wall Street</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/police-block-rough-up-arrest-journalists-covering-clearing-of-occupy-wall-street/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/police-block-rough-up-arrest-journalists-covering-clearing-of-occupy-wall-street/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media blackout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street raid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The free press took a blow when early this morning the New York Police Department raided the Occupy Wall Street encampment and lashed out at journalists covering the event. Many journalists were kept away from the action taken by the police to clear Zucotti Park. Many were subjected to violence and arrested with the protesters. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The free press took a blow when early this morning the New York Police Department raided the Occupy Wall Street encampment and lashed out at journalists covering the event.</p>
<p>Many journalists were kept away from the action taken by the police to clear Zucotti Park. Many were subjected to violence and arrested with the protesters. -db</p>
<p>From <strong><em>The Huffington Post</em></strong>, November 15, 2011, by Jack Mirkinson.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/15/occupy-wall-street-raid-journalists-arrested_n_1094564.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000003" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/15/occupy-wall-street-raid-journalists-arrested_n_1094564.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000003&amp;referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/police-block-rough-up-arrest-journalists-covering-clearing-of-occupy-wall-street/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free press: Reporters&#8217; group urges changes in FCC indecency enforcement</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/free-press-reporters-group-urges-changes-in-fcc-indecency-enforcement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/free-press-reporters-group-urges-changes-in-fcc-indecency-enforcement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bright-line rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expletives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC v. ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC v. Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indecency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCFOP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press filed a friend-of-the-court brief with the U.S. Supreme Court arguing that the Federal Communications Commission policy on indecency runs afoul of the First Amendment, even to the point of forcing broadcasters out of business with excessive fines. The Reporters Committee recommended that that a clear standard be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p><em>The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press</em> filed a friend-of-the-court brief with the U.S. Supreme Court arguing that the Federal Communications Commission policy on indecency runs afoul of the First Amendment, even to the point of forcing broadcasters out of business with excessive fines.</p>
<p>The Reporters Committee recommended that that a clear standard be set when regulating expletives or indecent material and that the broadcast industry be allowed to regulate themselves. -db</p>
<p>From a press release by <strong><em>The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press</em></strong>, November 11, 2011.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=12235" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=12235&amp;referer=');">Full release</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/free-press-reporters-group-urges-changes-in-fcc-indecency-enforcement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Publications face hard choices as pressure mounts against online sex ads</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/publications-face-hard-choices-as-pressure-mounts-against-online-sex-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/publications-face-hard-choices-as-pressure-mounts-against-online-sex-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 18:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adult sections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Backpage.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craigslist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media revenues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Twin Cities Reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Village Voice Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=17994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The Village Voice Media&#8217;s Backpage.com includes an adult section with the majority of ads involving adults, but occasionally or rarely an ad slips buy involving sex with minors. Revenue from &#8220;adult&#8221; sections help publications such as The Village Voice stay afloat, but as one theologian said, &#8220;Even if one minor is sold for sex, it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The Village Voice Media&#8217;s Backpage.com includes an adult section with the majority of ads involving adults, but occasionally or rarely an ad slips buy involving sex with minors. Revenue from &#8220;adult&#8221; sections help publications such as The Village Voice stay afloat, but as one theologian said, &#8220;Even if one minor is sold for sex, it is one too many.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Voice is under pressure to drop the adult section, but the owners point out that they are only providing a forum and are not legally responsible for the content and see the controversy as a free speech issue. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary in <em><strong>The New York Times</strong></em>, October 30, 2011, by David Carr.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/31/business/media/backpagecom-confronts-new-fight-over-online-sex-ads.html?_r=1&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.nytimes.com/2011/10/31/business/media/backpagecom-confronts-new-fight-over-online-sex-ads.html?_r=1_amp_partner=rssnyt_amp_emc=rss&amp;referer=');">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/publications-face-hard-choices-as-pressure-mounts-against-online-sex-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seattle school administration considers new policy of prior restraint for student free press</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/seattle-school-administration-considers-new-policy-of-prior-restraint-for-student-free-press/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/seattle-school-administration-considers-new-policy-of-prior-restraint-for-student-free-press/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 20:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eduational mission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obsencity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prior restaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prior review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[student press]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
A policy under consideration by the Seattle School Board would give principals the authority for prior review of high school newspapers and allow a stop to publication if they detected libel, obscenity and violations of the school&#8217;s educational mission. Critics argue that the principal would gain censorship powers and take responsibility for content out of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>A policy under consideration by the Seattle School Board would give principals the authority for prior review of high school newspapers and allow a stop to publication if they detected libel, obscenity and violations of the school&#8217;s educational mission.</p>
<p>Critics argue that the principal would gain censorship powers and take responsibility for content out of students&#8217; hands with the result that legal liability would rest solely on the administration. -db</p>
<p>From the <strong><em>Seattle Times</em></strong>, November 7, 2011, by Brian M. Rosenthal.</p>
<p><a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2016707090_censorship07m.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2016707090_censorship07m.html?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/seattle-school-administration-considers-new-policy-of-prior-restraint-for-student-free-press/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Journalist arrested during mass arrests in &#8216;Occupy Oakland&#8217; protest</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/journalist-arrested-during-mass-arrests-in-occupy-oakland-protest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/journalist-arrested-during-mass-arrests-in-occupy-oakland-protest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 18:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peaceful protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right to assembly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
A freelance cartoonist covering Occupy Oakland with a press pass was arrested and held 14 hours charged with failing to disperse and obstructing. -db From KGO-TV News, November 3, 2011, by Ama Daetz. Full story &#160; &#160; &#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>A freelance cartoonist covering Occupy Oakland with a press pass was arrested and held 14 hours charged with failing to disperse and obstructing. -db</p>
<p>From <strong><em>KGO-TV News</em></strong>, November 3, 2011, by Ama Daetz.</p>
<p><a href="http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/local/east_bay&amp;id=8418546" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/local/east_bay_amp_id=8418546&amp;referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/journalist-arrested-during-mass-arrests-in-occupy-oakland-protest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opinion: Arresting journalists covering Occupy protests an attack on Constitution</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/opinion-journalists-arrested-covering-occupy-demonstrations-an-attack-on-constitution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/opinion-journalists-arrested-covering-occupy-demonstrations-an-attack-on-constitution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 20:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[curfew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demonstrators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Nashville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right to know]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=17969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The First Amendment establishes a free press with the corollary need for journalists to report freely. When police arrest reporters as they did in Nashville during the Occupy Nashville protests, they are attacking the right of citizens to independent sources on what the government is doing, writes Gene Policinski of the First Amendment Center. -db [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The First Amendment establishes a free press with the corollary need for journalists to report freely. When police arrest reporters as they did in Nashville during the Occupy Nashville protests, they are attacking the right of citizens to independent sources on what the government is doing, writes Gene Policinski of the <em>First Amendment Center</em>. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary for the <strong><em> First Amendment Center,</em></strong> October 31, 2011, by Gene Policinski.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/arresting-journalists-with-demonstrators-hurts-us-all" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.firstamendmentcenter.org/arresting-journalists-with-demonstrators-hurts-us-all?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/opinion-journalists-arrested-covering-occupy-demonstrations-an-attack-on-constitution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Milwaukee newspaper photographer arrested covering rally supporting Occupy Wall Street</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/milwaukee-newspaper-photographer-arrested-covering-rally-supporting-occupy-wall-street/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/milwaukee-newspaper-photographer-arrested-covering-rally-supporting-occupy-wall-street/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 18:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milwaukee Journal Sentinel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peaceful demonstration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right to protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin News Photographers Association]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=17971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
In attempting to clear a street, Milwaukee policemen arrested a Milwaukee Sentinel Journal photographer covering a march near a university campus in support of the Occupy Wall Street movement. The police claimed the photographer did not identify herself as a journalist. -db From the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, November 2, 2011, by By Karen Herzog with contributions [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>In attempting to clear a street, Milwaukee policemen arrested a Milwaukee Sentinel Journal photographer covering a march near a university campus in support of the Occupy Wall Street movement.</p>
<p>The police claimed the photographer did not identify herself as a journalist. -db</p>
<p>From the <strong><em>Milwaukee Journal Sentinel</em></strong>, November 2, 2011, by By Karen Herzog with contributions from Sharif Durhams.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/js-photographer-arrested-while-covering-occupy-milwaukee-protest-133090133.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/js-photographer-arrested-while-covering-occupy-milwaukee-protest-133090133.html?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/milwaukee-newspaper-photographer-arrested-covering-rally-supporting-occupy-wall-street/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bloggers advocating democratic reform suffer oppression</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/bloggers-advocating-democratic-reform-suffer-oppression/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/bloggers-advocating-democratic-reform-suffer-oppression/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 17:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reforms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egypt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intimidation of bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reporters Without Borders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smear campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thailand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=17886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
Despite the promise of the Arab Spring, bloggers world-wide are seen as threats to public order and  arrested and imprisoned for speaking out for democratic reform. Bloggers are in danger in many countries including Syria, Egypt, Thailand and the United Arab Emirates. -db From a commentary by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, October 27, 2011, by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>Despite the promise of the Arab Spring, bloggers world-wide are seen as threats to public order and  arrested and imprisoned for speaking out for democratic reform.</p>
<p>Bloggers are in danger in many countries including Syria, Egypt, Thailand and the United Arab Emirates. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary by the <strong><em>Electronic Frontier Foundation</em></strong>, October 27, 2011, by Jillian C. York.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/10/week-internet-censorship" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/10/week-internet-censorship?referer=');">Full story </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/bloggers-advocating-democratic-reform-suffer-oppression/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama administration makes public database on doctor malpractice private</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/obama-administration-makes-public-database-on-doctor-malpractice-private/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/obama-administration-makes-public-database-on-doctor-malpractice-private/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 18:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access to Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access to government information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctor malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=17688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
Health reporters got a kick in the rear recently when the Obama administration withdrew a public database about doctor malpractice, writes Justin Silverman for the Citizens Media Law Project. The move came after a number of reporters used the national database to write stories about how their state regulators were reluctant to discipline doctors for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>Health reporters got a kick in the rear recently when the Obama administration withdrew a public database about doctor malpractice, writes Justin Silverman for the <em>Citizens Media Law Project</em>.</p>
<p>The move came after a number of reporters used the national database to write stories about how their state regulators were reluctant to discipline doctors for malpractice. -db</p>
<p>From the <strong><em>Citizens Media Law Project</em></strong>, October 20, 2011, by Justin Silverman.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2011/health-reporters-unite-how-one-doctors-complaint-turned-public-database-private" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2011/health-reporters-unite-how-one-doctors-complaint-turned-public-database-private?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/obama-administration-makes-public-database-on-doctor-malpractice-private/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

