<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>First Amendment Coalition &#187; National Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/category/resources/national-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org</link>
	<description>Defending Your Freedom of Speech &#38; Right to Know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:14:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Government study of leaks of classified documents calls for dialogue with media</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/government-study-of-leaks-of-classified-documents-calls-for-dialogue-with-media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/government-study-of-leaks-of-classified-documents-calls-for-dialogue-with-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access to Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classified documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Intelligency Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public right to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secrecy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
A study of leaks of classified information says that the friction caused by interests in keeping national security secrets and in the public&#8217;s right to know can be mitigated to some extent through improved understanding and management achieved partly through dialogue between the government and media. WikiLeaks has changed the secrecy terrain, writes Steven Aftergood [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>A study of leaks of classified information says that the friction caused by interests in keeping national security secrets and in the public&#8217;s right to know can be mitigated to some extent through improved understanding and management achieved partly through dialogue between the government and media.</p>
<p>WikiLeaks has changed the secrecy terrain, writes Steven Aftergood for <em>Secrecy News</em>, with the government&#8217;s increased focus on leaks and use of new surveillance tools. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary in <strong><em>Secrecy News</em></strong>, February 8, 2012, by Steven Aftergood.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2012/02/watchmen_ross.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2012/02/watchmen_ross.html?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/government-study-of-leaks-of-classified-documents-calls-for-dialogue-with-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACLU challenges federal government on records of drone attacks killing U.S. citizens in Yemen</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/aclu-challenges-federal-government-on-records-of-drone-attack-killing-u-s-citizens-in-yemen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/aclu-challenges-federal-government-on-records-of-drone-attack-killing-u-s-citizens-in-yemen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access to Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal FOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drone program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secrecy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The American Civil Liberties Union is suing the Obama administration to force them to release records related to the deaths by drone attacks of three U.S. citizens in Yemen. The administration cited national security in denying the request for the documents under the Freedom of Information Act, but the ACLU said the drone program should [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The American Civil Liberties Union is suing the Obama administration to force them to release records related to the deaths by drone attacks of three U.S. citizens in Yemen.</p>
<p>The administration cited national security in denying the request for the documents under the Freedom of Information Act, but the ACLU said the drone program should not be allowed to operate without transparency and accountability. -db</p>
<p>From <strong><em>The Washington Post</em></strong>, February 1, 2012, by Karen DeYoung.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/aclu-sues-to-force-release-of-drone-attack-records/2012/02/01/gIQArL6xhQ_story.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/aclu-sues-to-force-release-of-drone-attack-records/2012/02/01/gIQArL6xhQ_story.html?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/aclu-challenges-federal-government-on-records-of-drone-attack-killing-u-s-citizens-in-yemen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal agencies making scant progress in declassifying backlog</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/federal-agencies-making-scant-progress-in-declassifying-backlog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/federal-agencies-making-scant-progress-in-declassifying-backlog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access to Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyl-Lott Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Archives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Declassification Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Restricted Data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
Two years after President Barack Obama ordered government agencies to come up to speed on declassifying 400 million pages of old records, there has been little progress. The failure to make more progress is a sign that the secrecy system considers itself immune from presidential orders, writes Steven Aftergood of Secrecy News. -db From a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>Two years after President Barack Obama ordered government agencies to come up to speed on declassifying 400 million pages of old records, there has been little progress.</p>
<p>The failure to make more progress is a sign that the secrecy system considers itself immune from presidential orders, writes Steven Aftergood of<em> Secrecy News</em>. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary in <strong><em>Secrecy News</em></strong>, January 30, 2012 by Steven Aftergood.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2012/01/miss_deadline.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2012/01/miss_deadline.html?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/federal-agencies-making-scant-progress-in-declassifying-backlog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice Department cites threat of violence in U.S. in keeping  bin Laden photos secret</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/justice-department-cites-threat-of-violence-in-u-s-in-keeping-bin-laden-photos-secret/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/justice-department-cites-threat-of-violence-in-u-s-in-keeping-bin-laden-photos-secret/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Access to Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal FOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al Qaeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos of Osama bin Laden's dead body]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The Justice Department wants a federal judge to allow them to withhold photos of the death of Osama bin Laden on the grounds that releasing the photos could incite violence against the U.S. The DOJ disputed the arguments of Judicial Watch that making the photos public would cause harm to national security by revealing intelligence [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The Justice Department wants a federal judge to allow them to withhold photos of the death of Osama bin Laden on the grounds that releasing the photos could incite violence against the U.S.</p>
<p>The DOJ disputed the arguments of Judicial Watch that making the photos public would cause harm to national security by revealing intelligence methods or equipment. -db</p>
<p>From <strong><em>The Blog of Legal Times</em></strong>, January 26, 2012, by Mike Scarcella.</p>
<p><a href="http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2012/01/doj-defends-keeping-bin-laden-death-photos-secret.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2012/01/doj-defends-keeping-bin-laden-death-photos-secret.html?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/justice-department-cites-threat-of-violence-in-u-s-in-keeping-bin-laden-photos-secret/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government indicts former CIA officer for leaks of classfied information to journalists</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/government-indicts-former-cia-officer-for-leaks-of-classfied-information-to-journalists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/government-indicts-former-cia-officer-for-leaks-of-classfied-information-to-journalists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classified information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Espionage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligence Identities Protection Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The Justice Department  is charging a former intelligence officer with leaking classified information to a journalist. The leaks included the names of covert officers and their work in apprehending terrorist suspects. The officer is charged with divulging to a New York Times reporter the contact information and details of activities of a covert CIA operative. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The Justice Department  is charging a former intelligence officer with leaking classified information to a journalist. The leaks included the names of covert officers and their work in apprehending terrorist suspects.</p>
<p>The officer is charged with divulging to a <em>New York Times</em> reporter the contact information and details of activities of a covert CIA operative. -db</p>
<p>From <strong><em>The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press</em></strong>, January 23, 20112, by Andrea Papagianis.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rcfp.org/browse-media-law-resources/news/former-cia-officer-charged-leaking-info-journalists" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.rcfp.org/browse-media-law-resources/news/former-cia-officer-charged-leaking-info-journalists?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/government-indicts-former-cia-officer-for-leaks-of-classfied-information-to-journalists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appeal in the works in Twitter/WikiLeaks case</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/appeal-in-the-works-in-twitterwikileaks-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/appeal-in-the-works-in-twitterwikileaks-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EFF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secrecy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The American Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Frontier Foundation are set to file an appeal concerning the U.S. government&#8217;s attempts to obtain Twitter records in their investigation of WikiLeaks. The ACLU and EFF are seeking to prevent the government from sealing records of their efforts to obtain private information of Internet users without a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The <em>American Civil Liberties Union</em> and the <em>Electronic Frontier Foundation</em> are set to file an appeal concerning the U.S. government&#8217;s attempts to obtain Twitter records in their investigation of WikiLeaks.</p>
<p>The ACLU and EFF are seeking to prevent the government from sealing records of their efforts to obtain private information of Internet users without a warrant. -db</p>
<p>From a press release by the <strong><em>Electronic Frontier Foundation</em></strong>, January 20, 2012.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.eff.org/press/releases/aclu-eff-appeal-secrecy-ruling-twitterwikileaks-case" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.eff.org/press/releases/aclu-eff-appeal-secrecy-ruling-twitterwikileaks-case?referer=');">Full release</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/appeal-in-the-works-in-twitterwikileaks-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prosecutors seeking testimony of New York Times reporter in national security trial</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/prosecutors-seeking-testimony-of-new-york-times-reporter-in-national-security-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/prosecutors-seeking-testimony-of-new-york-times-reporter-in-national-security-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Battlefield Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Risen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeffrey Sterling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reporter's privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Truthdig.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war on terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
Prosecutors in the case of a former CIA officer Jeffrey Sterling accused of leaking classified information are attempting to reverse a lower court finding that a New York Times reporter James Risen was exempt from disclosing his sources for a story on a CIA program to disrupt Iran&#8217;s nuclear program. The government prosecutors claim that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>Prosecutors in the case of a former CIA officer Jeffrey Sterling accused of leaking classified information are attempting to reverse a lower court finding that a <em>New York Times</em> reporter James Risen was exempt from disclosing his sources for a story on a CIA program to disrupt Iran&#8217;s nuclear program.</p>
<p>The government prosecutors claim that there is no right for reporters to withhold identities of sources in criminal cases. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary in <strong><em>Secrecy News</em></strong>, January 17, 2012, by Steven Aftergood.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2012/01/sterling_appeal_brief.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2012/01/sterling_appeal_brief.html?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/prosecutors-seeking-testimony-of-new-york-times-reporter-in-national-security-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government forces clamp on Twitter demanding censorship</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/government-forces-clamp-on-twitter-demanding-censorship/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/government-forces-clamp-on-twitter-demanding-censorship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Shabaab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hezbollah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steisand effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The U.S. government has stepped up efforts to pressure Twitter to censor posts by a militant Somali group and the Taliban according to the Electronic Frontier Foundation. The Israeli government and U.S. Senator Joe Lieberman are also pressuring Twitter. -db From a commentary for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, January 6, 2012, byy Jillian C. York [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The U.S. government has stepped up efforts to pressure Twitter to censor posts by a militant Somali group and the Taliban according to the <em>Electronic Frontier Foundation</em>.</p>
<p>The Israeli government and U.S. Senator Joe Lieberman are also pressuring Twitter. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary for the <strong><em>Electronic Frontier Foundation</em></strong>, January 6, 2012, byy Jillian C. York and Trevor Timm.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/01/us-government-calls-censor-twitter-threaten-free-speech" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/01/us-government-calls-censor-twitter-threaten-free-speech?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/government-forces-clamp-on-twitter-demanding-censorship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Four cases in 2011 give boost to transparency</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/four-cases-on-2011give-boost-to-transparency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/four-cases-on-2011give-boost-to-transparency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 19:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access to Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal FOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EFF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC v. AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOIA Exemption 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigrants Secure Communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milner v. Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDLON v. ICE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shura Council v. FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
There were four cases over the Freedom of Information Act that promoted transparency in 2011 according to the Electronic Freedom Foundation. The cases were Milner v. Department of Navy, FCC v. AT&#38;T, Islamic Shura Council of S. Cal. v. FBI and National Day Laborer Organizing Network v. ICE. From a commentary for the Electronic Frontier [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>There were four cases over the Freedom of Information Act that promoted transparency in 2011 according to the Electronic Freedom Foundation.</p>
<p>The cases were Milner v. Department of Navy, FCC v. AT&amp;T, Islamic Shura Council of S. Cal. v. FBI and National Day Laborer Organizing Network v. ICE.</p>
<p>From a commentary for the <strong><em>Electronic Frontier Foundation</em></strong>, December 31, 2011, by Jennifer Lynch and Mark Rumold.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/12/four-cases-promoted-transparency-2011" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/12/four-cases-promoted-transparency-2011?referer=');">Full story </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/four-cases-on-2011give-boost-to-transparency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>American Civil Liberties Union claims secrecy hurting democracy</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/american-civil-liberties-union-claims-secrecy-hurting-democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/american-civil-liberties-union-claims-secrecy-hurting-democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 18:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal FOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nationala security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secrecy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The quest for national security after 9/11 has resulted in a number of secret agencies, Congressional committees, courts and even laws argues the American Civil Liberties Union. The ACLU claims that these practices deprive lawmakers and the public of information needed to check abuses and to make policy. -db From a commentary for the American [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The quest for national security after 9/11 has resulted in a number of secret agencies, Congressional committees, courts and even laws argues the <em>American Civil Liberties Union</em>.</p>
<p>The <em>ACLU</em> claims that these practices deprive lawmakers and the public of information needed to check abuses and to make policy. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary for the <strong><em>American Civil Liberties Union</em></strong>, December 19, 2011.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security/trashing-transparency" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.aclu.org/blog/national-security/trashing-transparency?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/american-civil-liberties-union-claims-secrecy-hurting-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Los Angeles Times editorial sides with Secret Service in arrest of protesting man</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/los-angeles-times-editorial-sides-with-secret-service-in-arrest-of-protesting-man/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/los-angeles-times-editorial-sides-with-secret-service-in-arrest-of-protesting-man/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 20:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policitical speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right to protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secret Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
When the U.S. Supreme Court decides the case of a protesting man arrested for laying a hand on then-Vice President Dick Cheney in a shopping mall in 2006, it will have to balance the man&#8217;s free speech rights against the need of the Secret Service to make difficult split-second decisions to protect life, in this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>When the U.S. Supreme Court decides the case of a protesting man arrested for laying a hand on then-Vice President Dick Cheney in a shopping mall in 2006, it will have to balance the man&#8217;s free speech rights against the need of the Secret Service to make difficult split-second decisions to protect life, in this case the life of the Vice President, without fear of being sued.</p>
<p>A <em>Los Angeles Times</em> editorial argues that a free speech defense must not act as a cover for lawless actions. -db</p>
<p>From an editorial in the <strong><em>Los Angeles Times</em></strong>, December 7, 201.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/opinionla/la-ed-cheney-20111207,0,7517211.story" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.latimes.com/news/opinion/opinionla/la-ed-cheney-20111207_0_7517211.story?referer=');">Full editorial</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/los-angeles-times-editorial-sides-with-secret-service-in-arrest-of-protesting-man/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State Department still says cables WikiLeaks released last year are classified</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/state-department-still-says-cables-wikileaks-released-last-year-are-classified/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/state-department-still-says-cables-wikileaks-released-last-year-are-classified/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 18:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal FOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanomo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rendition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secrecy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The Obama administration is still insisting that cables WikiLeaks released last year are classified even though the cables were released by the State Department in compliance with a Freedom of Information Act request. The classified information concerned targeted killings, detention at Guantanamo, torture and rendition. -db From a commentary for the American Civil Liberties Union, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The Obama administration is still insisting that cables WikiLeaks released last year are classified even though the cables were released by the State Department in compliance with a Freedom of Information Act request.</p>
<p>The classified information concerned targeted killings, detention at Guantanamo, torture and rendition. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary for the <strong><em>American Civil Liberties Union</em></strong>, December 7, 2011, by Nathan Freed Wessler and Anna Estevao.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security/secrecy-without-sense-state-department-censors-cables-already-published" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.aclu.org/blog/national-security/secrecy-without-sense-state-department-censors-cables-already-published?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/state-department-still-says-cables-wikileaks-released-last-year-are-classified/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Supreme Court accepts free speech case involving then Vice President Dick Cheney</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/u-s-supreme-court-accepts-free-speech-case-involving-then-vice-president-dick-cheney/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/u-s-supreme-court-accepts-free-speech-case-involving-then-vice-president-dick-cheney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 20:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights violations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[probable cause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reichle v. Howards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secret Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[threat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
A man who expressed his dislike of the Iraq war to then-Vice President Dick Cheney and was arrested for putting his hand on Cheney&#8217;s shoulder will have his First Amendment suit heard by the U.S. Supreme Court. The man claimed his arrest came about because of his political views. The Justice Department said Secret Service [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>A man who expressed his dislike of the Iraq war to then-Vice President Dick Cheney and was arrested for putting his hand on Cheney&#8217;s shoulder will have his First Amendment suit heard by the U.S. Supreme Court.</p>
<p>The man claimed his arrest came about because of his political views. The Justice Department said Secret Service agents must be free to make instantaneous decisions without fear of  lawsuits. -db</p>
<p>From <strong><em>CNN</em></strong>, December 5, 2011, by Bill Mears.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2011/12/05/us/scotus-free-speech-cheney/index.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.cnn.com/2011/12/05/us/scotus-free-speech-cheney/index.html?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/u-s-supreme-court-accepts-free-speech-case-involving-then-vice-president-dick-cheney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WikiLeaks reveals details on &#8216;mass surveillance industry&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/wikileaks-reveals-details-on-mass-surveillance-industry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/wikileaks-reveals-details-on-mass-surveillance-industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 18:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access to Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ARD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bugged Planet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bureau of Investigative Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights abuses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mass surveillance industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks Spy Files]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
WikiLeaks released  the first documents of a massive cache of documents from contractors involved in surveillance. To make the release, WikiLeaks worked with two other nonprofits and with the media including the Washington Post. WikiLeaks said surveillance companies were invading personal computers and cell phones. -db From Mashable, December 1, 2011, by Stan Schroeder. Full [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p><em>WikiLeak</em>s released  the first documents of a massive cache of documents from contractors involved in surveillance. To make the release, <em>WikiLeaks</em> worked with two other nonprofits and with the media including the <em>Washington Post</em>.</p>
<p>WikiLeaks said surveillance companies were invading personal computers and cell phones. -db</p>
<p>From <strong><em>Mashable</em></strong>, December 1, 2011, by Stan Schroeder.<br />
<a href="http://mashable.com/2011/12/01/wikileaks-spy-files/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/mashable.com/2011/12/01/wikileaks-spy-files/?referer=');"><br />
Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/12/wikileaks-reveals-details-on-mass-surveillance-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opinion: China&#8217;s censorship regimen spreading around the world</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/opinion-chinas-censorship-regime-spreading-around-the-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/opinion-chinas-censorship-regime-spreading-around-the-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
Totalitarian regimes around the world are successfully using the Chinese model of censorship against their citizens, reports David Rohde in a commentary for Reuters. Rohde says the Stop Online Piracy Act would seriously erode the ability of the United States to fight the new tide of international Internet censorship. -db From a commentary for Reuters, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>Totalitarian regimes around the world are successfully using the Chinese model of censorship against their citizens, reports David Rohde in a commentary for <em>Reuters</em>.</p>
<p>Rohde says the Stop Online Piracy Act would seriously erode the ability of the United States to fight the new tide of international Internet censorship. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary for <strong><em>Reuters</em></strong>, November 18, 2011, by David Rohde.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/david-rohde/2011/11/17/chinas-newest-export-internet-censorship/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/blogs.reuters.com/david-rohde/2011/11/17/chinas-newest-export-internet-censorship/?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/opinion-chinas-censorship-regime-spreading-around-the-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opinion: WikiLeaks made significant contributions to the right to know</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/opinion-wikileaks-made-significant-contributions-to-the-right-to-know/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/opinion-wikileaks-made-significant-contributions-to-the-right-to-know/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 19:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Espionage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of infomation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mainstream media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
WikiLeaks has changed the face of journalism and contributed more scoops this year than any other media outlet, reports Trevor Timm in a commentary for the Electronic Frontier Foundation. In using the Espionage Act to prosecute WikiLeaks, the federal government poses a real threat to the mainsream media and the First Amendment, argues Timm. -db [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>WikiLeaks has changed the face of journalism and contributed more scoops this year than any other media outlet, reports Trevor Timm in a commentary for the <em>Electronic Frontier Foundation</em>.</p>
<p>In using the Espionage Act to prosecute WikiLeaks, the federal government poses a real threat to the mainsream media and the First Amendment, argues Timm. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary for the <strong><em>Electronic Frontier Foundation</em></strong>, November 28, 2011, by Trevor Timm.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/11/cablegate-one-year-later-how-wikileaks-has-influenced-foreign-policy-journalism" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/11/cablegate-one-year-later-how-wikileaks-has-influenced-foreign-policy-journalism?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/opinion-wikileaks-made-significant-contributions-to-the-right-to-know/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal court sanctions federal government for lying about existence of records on surveillance of Muslim groups</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/federal-court-sanctions-federal-government-for-lying-about-existence-of-records-on-surveillance-of-muslim-groups/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/federal-court-sanctions-federal-government-for-lying-about-existence-of-records-on-surveillance-of-muslim-groups/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access to Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal FOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islamic Shura Council v. FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lying to court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
A federal district court in California objected to the FBI&#8217;s practice of withholding information from the court whenever it thinks it serves the interest of national security. While the court said national security interests could justify withholding the information about targeting Muslim organizations from the Islamic Shura Council and its attorneys, it could not block [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>A federal district court in California objected to the FBI&#8217;s practice of withholding information from the court whenever it thinks it serves the interest of national security.</p>
<p>While the court said national security interests could justify withholding the information about targeting Muslim organizations from the Islamic Shura Council and its attorneys, it could not block the court from seeing the records. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary for the <strong><em>Electronic Freedom Foundation</em></strong>, November 21, 2011, by Jennifer Lynch.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/05/fbi-chastised-court-lying-about-existence" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/05/fbi-chastised-court-lying-about-existence?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/federal-court-sanctions-federal-government-for-lying-about-existence-of-records-on-surveillance-of-muslim-groups/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defense Department makes it easier to obtain court filings in Guantanamo trials</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/defense-department-makes-it-easier-to-obtain-court-filings-in-guantanamo-trials/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/defense-department-makes-it-easier-to-obtain-court-filings-in-guantanamo-trials/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access to Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military commissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protective order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secrecy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secret courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism-related secrecy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
As trials of accused terrorists begin at Guantanamo Bay, the Defense Department released new regulations designed to create better access to court filings. Journalists have objected to the long review processes for obtaining court filings without which they were lost when covering the trials. -db From The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, November [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>As trials of accused terrorists begin at Guantanamo Bay, the Defense Department released new regulations designed to create better access to court filings.</p>
<p>Journalists have objected to the long review processes for obtaining court filings without which they were lost when covering the trials. -db</p>
<p>From <em><strong>The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press</strong></em>, November 22, 2011, by Kirsten Berg.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=12248" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=12248&amp;referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/defense-department-makes-it-easier-to-obtain-court-filings-in-guantanamo-trials/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice Department refuses request for legal opinion concerning FBI surveillance</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/justice-department-refuses-request-legal-opinion-concerning-fbi-surveillance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/justice-department-refuses-request-legal-opinion-concerning-fbi-surveillance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal FOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EFF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office of Legal Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war on terror]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The Justice Department has refused a request by the Electronic Frontier Foundation for an important legal opinon on the use of &#8220;exigent letters,&#8221; a method of requesting information that includes telephone company records. In refusing to disclose the legal opinion, the DOJ cited national security concerns. -db From Politico, November 11, 2011, by Josh Gerstein. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The Justice Department has refused a request by the <em>Electronic Frontier Foundation</em> for an important legal opinon on the use of &#8220;exigent letters,&#8221; a method of requesting information that includes telephone company records.</p>
<p>In refusing to disclose the legal opinion, the DOJ cited national security concerns. -db</p>
<p>From <em><strong>Politico</strong></em>, November 11, 2011, by Josh Gerstein.<a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/joshgerstein/1111/Obama_wont_release_another_surveillance_opinion.html?showall" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.politico.com/blogs/joshgerstein/1111/Obama_wont_release_another_surveillance_opinion.html?showall&amp;referer=');"><br />
</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/joshgerstein/1111/Obama_wont_release_another_surveillance_opinion.html?showall" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.politico.com/blogs/joshgerstein/1111/Obama_wont_release_another_surveillance_opinion.html?showall&amp;referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/justice-department-refuses-request-legal-opinion-concerning-fbi-surveillance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice Department gains right to WikiLeaks associates&#8217; Twitter info</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/justice-department-gains-right-to-wikileaks-associates-twitter-info/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/justice-department-gains-right-to-wikileaks-associates-twitter-info/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 21:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stored Communicatons Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
A federal judge upheld a lower court decision that the Justice Department may obtain records of twitter accounts of three current and former WikiLeaks associates. Under the ruling by the lower court, the order includes records showing the times messages were sent to one another and the Internet IP addresses but does not include the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>A federal judge upheld a lower court decision that the Justice Department may obtain records of twitter accounts of three current and former WikiLeaks associates.</p>
<p>Under the ruling by the lower court, the order includes records showing the times messages were sent to one another and the Internet IP addresses but does not include the content of messages nor information on other Twitter user who follow the accounts. -db</p>
<p>From <strong><em>Wired</em></strong>, November 10, 2011, by Kevein Poulsen.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/11/wikileaks-twitter-ruling/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/11/wikileaks-twitter-ruling/?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/justice-department-gains-right-to-wikileaks-associates-twitter-info/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal judge rules against New York Times in withholding of records of FBI terrorism investigations</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/federal-judge-rules-against-new-york-times-in-withholding-of-records-of-fbi-terrorism-investigations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/federal-judge-rules-against-new-york-times-in-withholding-of-records-of-fbi-terrorism-investigations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access to Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic spying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natonal security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reasonable suspicion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
A federal judge ruled that the FBI could withhold data from its terrorism investigations from a New York Times investigative reporter. The judge said The New York Times had not rebutted the FBI&#8217;s statement that they had fulfilled requests made under the Freedom of Information Act except for that under FOIA exemption. -db From the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>A federal judge ruled that the FBI could withhold data from its terrorism investigations from a New York Times investigative reporter.</p>
<p>The judge said <em>The New York Times</em> had not rebutted the FBI&#8217;s statement that they had fulfilled requests made under the Freedom of Information Act except for that under FOIA exemption. -db</p>
<p>From the <em><strong>Courthouse News Service</strong></em>, November 10, 2011, by Adam Klasfeld.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/11/10/41369.htm" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.courthousenews.com/2011/11/10/41369.htm?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/federal-judge-rules-against-new-york-times-in-withholding-of-records-of-fbi-terrorism-investigations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Homeland Security sued for mashing whistleblowers</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/homeland-security-sued-for-mashing-whistleblowers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/homeland-security-sued-for-mashing-whistleblowers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 20:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access to Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cat's Paw program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retaliation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistleblowers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=18018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
A former Customs officer sued in federal court claiming that the Department of Homeland Security operates a &#8220;Cat&#8217;s Paw&#8221; program that fosters action against whistleblowers that can&#8217;t be traced back to the supervisor that initiates the retaliation. The officer claimed that the retaliations were often inappropriate and that federal whistleblower laws were ineffective in protecting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>A former Customs officer sued in federal court claiming that the Department of Homeland Security operates a &#8220;Cat&#8217;s Paw&#8221; program that fosters action against whistleblowers that can&#8217;t be traced back to the supervisor that initiates the retaliation.</p>
<p>The officer claimed that the retaliations were often inappropriate and that federal whistleblower laws were ineffective in protecting employees trying to expose wrongdoing. -db</p>
<p>From the <strong><em>Courthouse News Service</em></strong>, Nobember 7, 2011, by Marimer Matos.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/11/07/41227.htm" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.courthousenews.com/2011/11/07/41227.htm?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/homeland-security-sued-for-mashing-whistleblowers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice Department withdraws rule change on FOIA requests</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/justice-department-withdraws-rule-change-on-foia-requests/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/justice-department-withdraws-rule-change-on-foia-requests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 19:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal FOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=17978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
Reacting to pressure from legislators and open government advocates, the Department of Justice withdrew a proposal to allow government agencies to respond to Freedom of Information Act requests with false denials. The proposal would have allowed them to deny that records exist when they actually did. -db From a press release from the American Civil [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>Reacting to pressure from legislators and open government advocates, the Department of Justice withdrew a proposal to allow government agencies to respond to Freedom of Information Act requests with false denials. The proposal would have allowed them to deny that records exist when they actually did. -db</p>
<p>From a press release from the <strong><em>American Civil Liberties Union</em></strong>, November 3, 2011.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.aclu.org/free-speech-national-security/justice-department-withdraws-proposed-rule-change-freedom-information" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.aclu.org/free-speech-national-security/justice-department-withdraws-proposed-rule-change-freedom-information?referer=');">Full release</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/justice-department-withdraws-rule-change-on-foia-requests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WikiLeaks founder loses round in attempt to avoid extradition to Sweden to face alleged rape charge</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/wikileaks-founder-loses-round-in-attempt-to-avoid-extradition-to-sweden-to-face-alleged-rape-charge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/wikileaks-founder-loses-round-in-attempt-to-avoid-extradition-to-sweden-to-face-alleged-rape-charge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 18:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extradition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Assange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistleblowing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=17973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
Britain&#8217;s High Court found that the sex charges were sufficiently serious to warrant extradition of WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange to Sweden. Assange&#8217;s attorneys contend  that the sex changes were politically motivated, part of a plot to extradite Assange to the United States for prosecution over the WikiLeaks release of thousands of cables on the Afghanistan [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>Britain&#8217;s High Court found that the sex charges were sufficiently serious to warrant extradition of WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange to Sweden.</p>
<p>Assange&#8217;s attorneys contend  that the sex changes were politically motivated, part of a plot to extradite Assange to the United States for prosecution over the WikiLeaks release of thousands of cables on the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. -db</p>
<p>From the <strong><em> Los Angeles Times</em></strong>, November 2, 2011, by Henry Chu and Janet Stobart.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-assange-extradite-20111103,0,5241869.story" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-assange-extradite-20111103_0_5241869.story?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/wikileaks-founder-loses-round-in-attempt-to-avoid-extradition-to-sweden-to-face-alleged-rape-charge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Commission unveils war fraud, seals records for 20 years</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/commission-unveils-war-fraud-seals-records-for-20-years/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/commission-unveils-war-fraud-seals-records-for-20-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 18:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access to Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal FOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classified documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CWC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Archives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POGO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=17937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
After uncovering $60 billion in contractor waste and fraud in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Commission on Wartime Contracting buried its internal records for 20 years. The Commission did release 8 reports and publish recommendations to avoid waste and fraud, but the decision to block access to the internal records and source material prevents the public [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>After uncovering $60 billion in contractor waste and fraud in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Commission on Wartime Contracting buried its internal records for 20 years.</p>
<p>The Commission did release 8 reports and publish recommendations to avoid waste and fraud, but the decision to block access to the internal records and source material prevents the public and nonprofits from building on the work of the Commission, writes Jake Wiens, an investigator for<em> POGO</em>.  -db</p>
<p>From a commentary for the <strong><em>Project on Government Oversight (POGO)</em></strong>, November 1, 2011, by Jake Wiens.</p>
<p><a href="http://pogoblog.typepad.com/pogo/2011/11/wartime-contracting-commissions-move-to-seal-records-for-20-years-just-plain-wrong.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/pogoblog.typepad.com/pogo/2011/11/wartime-contracting-commissions-move-to-seal-records-for-20-years-just-plain-wrong.html?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/11/commission-unveils-war-fraud-seals-records-for-20-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACLU publishes article outlining rights of photographers</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/aclu-issues-guide-outlining-rights-of-photographers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/aclu-issues-guide-outlining-rights-of-photographers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 18:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airline security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filming police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harassment of photographers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photograhers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public places]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videotaping]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=17897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The American Civil Liberties Union outlines the rights of photographers to help them resist attempts of law enforcement to prevent them from taking photos in public places. -db From a commentary for the American Civil Liberties Union, October 31, 2011. Full story]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The <em>American Civil Liberties Union</em> outlines the rights of photographers to help them resist attempts of law enforcement to prevent them from taking photos in public places. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary for the <strong><em>American Civil Liberties Union</em></strong>, October 31, 2011.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.aclu.org/free-speech/know-your-rights-photographers" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.aclu.org/free-speech/know-your-rights-photographers?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/aclu-issues-guide-outlining-rights-of-photographers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACLU suing Los Angeles sheriff for limiting photography in public places</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/aclu-suing-los-angeles-sheriff-for-limiting-photography-in-public-places/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/aclu-suing-los-angeles-sheriff-for-limiting-photography-in-public-places/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 17:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artistic expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photographers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police harassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=17888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The American Civil Liberties Union is invoking the First Amendment in suing the Los Angeles Sheriff&#8217;s Department for labeling photography in key public places as &#8220;suspicious activity.&#8221; In three separate incidents, sheriff deputies detained photographers, at a Los Angeles Metro, industrial buildings, and the Long Beach courthouse. -db From The Reporters Committee for Freedom of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The American Civil Liberties Union is invoking the First Amendment in suing the Los Angeles Sheriff&#8217;s Department for labeling photography in key public places as &#8220;suspicious activity.&#8221;</p>
<p>In three separate incidents, sheriff deputies detained photographers, at a Los Angeles Metro, industrial buildings, and the Long Beach courthouse. -db</p>
<p>From <strong><em>The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press</em></strong>, October 28, 2011, by  J.C. Derrick.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=12226" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=12226&amp;referer=');">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/aclu-suing-los-angeles-sheriff-for-limiting-photography-in-public-places/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. diplomat suspended for publishing book criticizing Iraq war policy</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/u-s-diplomat-suspended-for-publishing-book-criticizing-iraq-war-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/u-s-diplomat-suspended-for-publishing-book-criticizing-iraq-war-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classified information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garcetti v. Ceballos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[We Meant Well]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=17884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The Obama administration suspended Foreign Services Officer Peter Van Buren for his book critical of the State Department operations in Iraq. Van Buren also installed a link to WikiLeaks on his blog. &#8220;No one was particularly concerned about what we were doing, how much money we were spending, and the results of our endeavors,”  Van [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The Obama administration suspended Foreign Services Officer Peter Van Buren for his book critical of the State Department operations in Iraq. Van Buren also installed a link to WikiLeaks on his blog.</p>
<p>&#8220;No one was particularly concerned about what we were doing, how much  money we were spending, and the results of our endeavors,”  Van Buren said of his experiences in Iraq in a speech to the National Press Club last week.</p>
<p>From <strong><em>The Talk Radio News Service</em></strong>, October 27, 2011, by Elianna Mintz.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.talkradionews.com/news/2011/10/27/us-diplomat-suspended-for-writing-controversial-book-linking.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.talkradionews.com/news/2011/10/27/us-diplomat-suspended-for-writing-controversial-book-linking.html?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/u-s-diplomat-suspended-for-publishing-book-criticizing-iraq-war-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sources in peril as journalists fail to keep pace in cybersecurity</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/sources-in-peril-as-journalists-fail-to-keep-pace-in-cybersecurity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/sources-in-peril-as-journalists-fail-to-keep-pace-in-cybersecurity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymous sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protecting sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=17880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
A robust free press often relies on anonymous sources with reporters going to prison to protect these sources, but with the advances in electronic surveillance, journalists are ill-equipped to protect these sources, writes Christopher Soghoian, an expert in cybersecurity, in an op-ed for The New York Times. Soghoian says that news organizations need to invest [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>A robust free press often relies on anonymous sources with reporters going to prison to protect these sources, but with the advances in electronic surveillance, journalists are ill-equipped to protect these sources, writes Christopher Soghoian, an expert in cybersecurity, in an op-ed for <em>The New York Times</em>.</p>
<p>Soghoian says that news organizations need to invest in security, training journalists and  setting up intercept-resistant lines of communication. -db</p>
<p>From an op-ed for <strong>The New York Times</strong>, October 26, 2011, by Christopher Soghoian.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/27/opinion/without-computer-security-sources-secrets-arent-safe-with-journalists.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.nytimes.com/2011/10/27/opinion/without-computer-security-sources-secrets-arent-safe-with-journalists.html?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/sources-in-peril-as-journalists-fail-to-keep-pace-in-cybersecurity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital freedom watchdog sues Justice Department over Patriot Act</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/digital-freedom-watchdog-sues-justice-department-over-patriot-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/digital-freedom-watchdog-sues-justice-department-over-patriot-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 19:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access to Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal FOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EFF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patriot Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secrecy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=17797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The Electronic Freedom Foundation sued the Department of Justice for its failure to release documents detailing its interpretation and use of Section 215 of the U.S.A. Patriot Act. The section allows the FBI to obtain a court order for &#8220;any tangible thing&#8221; related to a terrorism investigation. The EFF claims the government has been misusing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The <em>Electronic Freedom Foundation</em> sued the Department of Justice for its failure to release documents detailing its interpretation and use of Section 215 of the U.S.A. Patriot Act. The section allows the FBI to obtain a court order for &#8220;any tangible thing&#8221; related to a terrorism investigation.</p>
<p>The <em>EFF</em> claims the government has been misusing the Patriot Act to investigate citizens without their knowledge. -db</p>
<p>From the <strong><em>Courthouse News Service</em></strong>, October 27, 2011, by Maria Dinzeo.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/10/27/40973.htm" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.courthousenews.com/2011/10/27/40973.htm?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/digital-freedom-watchdog-sues-justice-department-over-patriot-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice Department proposes change to Freedom of Information Act that facilitates hiding records</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/justice-department-proposes-change-to-freedom-of-information-act-to-allow-denial-that-records-exist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/justice-department-proposes-change-to-freedom-of-information-act-to-allow-denial-that-records-exist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 20:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access to Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal FOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CREW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glomar denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenTheGovernment.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=17781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The Justice Department has proposed a rule change for the FOIA to allow government agencies to deny that records do not exist when they do. As it stands now the government can withhold information and issue a Glomar denial that says they neither confirm nor deny the records exist. Open government advocates say that the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The Justice Department has proposed a rule change for the FOIA to allow government agencies to deny that records do not exist when they do. As it stands now the government can withhold information and issue a Glomar denial that says they neither confirm nor deny the records exist.</p>
<p>Open government advocates say that the rule change would deliver a blow to transparency in that with the proposed rule, those seeking information would be inclined to forego appealing denial of the request concluding that the information doesn&#8217;t exist. -db</p>
<p>From <em><strong>ProPublica</strong></em>, October 24, 2011, by Jennifer LaFleur.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.propublica.org/article/government-could-hide-existence-of-records-under-foia-rule-proposal" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.propublica.org/article/government-could-hide-existence-of-records-under-foia-rule-proposal?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/justice-department-proposes-change-to-freedom-of-information-act-to-allow-denial-that-records-exist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama administration bids to keep White House visitor logs from public</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/obama-administration-bids-to-keep-white-house-visitor-logs-from-public/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/obama-administration-bids-to-keep-white-house-visitor-logs-from-public/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secret Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House visitor logs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=17469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The Obama administration is appealing a judge&#8217;s ruling that Secret Service records of White House visitors come under the Freedom of Information Act and must be disclosed to the public. The Justice Department claims the records are presidential records not agency records so not subject to the FOIA. -db From Politico, October 14, 2011, by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The Obama administration is appealing a judge&#8217;s ruling that Secret Service records of White House visitors come under the Freedom of Information Act and must be disclosed to the public.</p>
<p>The Justice Department claims the records are presidential records not agency records so not subject to the FOIA. -db</p>
<p>From <strong><em>Politico</em></strong>, October 14, 2011, by Josh Gerstein.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/joshgerstein/1011/Obama_administration_appeals_ruling_on_White_House_visitor_logs.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.politico.com/blogs/joshgerstein/1011/Obama_administration_appeals_ruling_on_White_House_visitor_logs.html?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/obama-administration-bids-to-keep-white-house-visitor-logs-from-public/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opinion: Air Force covers up 2010 fatal crash of Osprey in Afghanistan</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/opinionair-force-covers-up-2010-fatal-crash-of-osprey-in-afghanistan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/opinionair-force-covers-up-2010-fatal-crash-of-osprey-in-afghanistan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access to data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cover up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osprey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=17460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
With the black box destroyed and top Air Force brass denying that engine failure was responsible, it is difficult to determine a cause for the crash of Osprey 06-0031 in Afghanistan in 2010. The lead investigator of the accident had earlier concluded that the likely cause was engine failure. David Axe for Wired writes that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>With the black box destroyed and top Air Force brass denying that engine failure was responsible, it is difficult to determine a cause for the crash of Osprey 06-0031 in Afghanistan in 2010. The lead investigator of the accident had earlier concluded that the likely cause was engine failure.</p>
<p>David Axe for <em>Wired</em> writes that there is a history of covering up the Osprey&#8217;s mechanical problems and that the Air Force has too much invested in the airplane to accede to a full safety check. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary in <strong><em>Wired</em></strong>, October 17, 2011, by David Axe.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/10/osprey-crash-cover-up/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/10/osprey-crash-cover-up/?referer=');">Full story </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/opinionair-force-covers-up-2010-fatal-crash-of-osprey-in-afghanistan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Challenge to federal appeals court&#8217;s extending Espionage Act to unclassified info</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/challenge-to-federal-appeals-courts-extending-espionage-act-to-unclassified-info/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/challenge-to-federal-appeals-courts-extending-espionage-act-to-unclassified-info/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classified information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic espionage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Espionage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national defense information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secrecy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=17429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
An effort is underway to challenge a federal court ruling that extended the application of the Espionage Act to unclassified, non-governmental information. An attorney for a man convicted on charges of economic espionage filed a petition with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals claiming the conviction for &#8220;gathering national defense information&#8221; was unjust in that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>An effort is underway to challenge a federal court ruling that extended the application of the Espionage Act to unclassified, non-governmental information.</p>
<p>An attorney for a man convicted on charges of economic espionage filed a petition with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals claiming the conviction for &#8220;gathering national defense information&#8221; was unjust in that none of the information was classified or even held by the government. -db</p>
<p>From <em><strong>Secrecy News</strong></em>, October 13, 2011, by Steven Aftergood.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/challenge-to-federal-appeals-courts-extending-espionage-act-to-unclassified-info/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama releases executive order to tighten security in WikiLeaks era</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/obama-releases-executive-order-to-tighten-security-in-wikileaks-era/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/obama-releases-executive-order-to-tighten-security-in-wikileaks-era/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access to Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Classified Information Sharing and Safeguarding Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insider Threat Task Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal auditing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=17336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The Obama administration has taken steps to safeguard classified secrets and to insure that with safeguards agencies still share critical intelligence. The president&#8217;s executive order will establish internal auditing systems to assess information security and sharing throughout the federal government. The order also sets up a study to determine whether agencies can identify people who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The Obama administration has taken steps to safeguard classified secrets and to insure that with safeguards agencies still share critical intelligence. The president&#8217;s executive order will establish internal auditing systems to assess information security and sharing throughout the federal government.</p>
<p>The order also sets up a study to determine whether agencies can identify people who would leak information or otherwise mishandle sensitive data. -db</p>
<p>From the <em><strong>National Journal</strong></em>, October 7, 2011, by Marc Ambinder.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/obama-to-issue-executive-order-on-classified-info-after-wikileaks-20111007?mrefid=site_search" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.nationaljournal.com/obama-to-issue-executive-order-on-classified-info-after-wikileaks-20111007?mrefid=site_search&amp;referer=');">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/obama-releases-executive-order-to-tighten-security-in-wikileaks-era/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Secrecy News laments lack of accountability in denying information</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/secrecy-news-laments-lack-of-accountability-in-denying-information/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/secrecy-news-laments-lack-of-accountability-in-denying-information/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access to Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal FOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["Top Secret America"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overclassification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secrecy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=17327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
Some argue that if government classifiers were required to justify their classifications with clear, precise written explanation, there would be less information consigned to secrecy, writes Steven Aftergood for Secrecy News. As of now, officials get away with saying &#8220;it is secret because it&#8217;s secret,&#8221; but Aftergood thinks that it is not enough to require [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>Some argue that if government classifiers were required to justify their classifications with clear, precise written explanation, there would be less information consigned to secrecy, writes Steven Aftergood for <em>Secrecy News</em>.</p>
<p>As of now, officials get away with saying &#8220;it is secret because it&#8217;s secret,&#8221; but Aftergood thinks that it is not enough to require explanation, that establishing a review process would do more to achieve greater transparency. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary in <strong><em>Secrecy News</em></strong>, October 6, 2011, by Steven Aftergood.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/secrecy-news-laments-lack-of-accountability-in-denying-information/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Diplomat shares perspective on reading diplomatic cables released by WikiLeak</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/diplomat-shares-perspective-on-reading-diplomatic-cables-released-by-wikileak/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/diplomat-shares-perspective-on-reading-diplomatic-cables-released-by-wikileak/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal FOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secrecy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top secret]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Foreign Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=17324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
A former diplomat provides a practical guide for reading diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks with perspectives for working journalists and others on the value of the information. -db From Wired, October 7, 2011, by Daniel Serwer. Full story]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>A former diplomat provides a practical guide for reading diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks with perspectives for working journalists and others on the value of the information. -db</p>
<p>From <strong><em>Wired,</em></strong> October 7, 2011, by Daniel Serwer.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/10/diplomat-guide-wikileaks/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/10/diplomat-guide-wikileaks/?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/diplomat-shares-perspective-on-reading-diplomatic-cables-released-by-wikileak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal judge rules for CIA in destruction of interrogation videotapes</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/federal-judge-rules-for-cia-in-destruction-of-interrogation-videtapes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/federal-judge-rules-for-cia-in-destruction-of-interrogation-videtapes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal FOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enhanced interrogation techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secrecy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videotapes of interrogations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=17319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The American Civil Liberties Union and allies lost a bid in federal court to find out who was responsible for destroying nearly 100 videotapes of interrogations in 2001 of al Qaeda leaders. The judge noted that the CIA had erred in destroying the videotapes but had since made changes to prevent the destruction of videos [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The American Civil Liberties Union and allies lost a bid in federal court to find out who was responsible for destroying nearly 100 videotapes of interrogations in 2001 of al Qaeda leaders.</p>
<p>The judge noted that the CIA had erred in destroying the videotapes but had since made changes to prevent the destruction of videos in the future. -db</p>
<p>From the<em><strong> Courthouse News Service</strong></em>, October 6, 2011, by Adam Klasfeld.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/10/06/40391.htm" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.courthousenews.com/2011/10/06/40391.htm?referer=');">Full story </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/federal-judge-rules-for-cia-in-destruction-of-interrogation-videtapes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drone strikes out in open but still classified and not subject to discussion</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/drone-strikes-out-in-open-but-still-classified-and-not-subject-to-discussion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/drone-strikes-out-in-open-but-still-classified-and-not-subject-to-discussion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access to Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drone strikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overclassification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secrecy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=17296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
When a U.S. drone strike killed a U.S. citizen in Yemen who was a prominent al Qaeda terrorist, President Barack Obama would not acknowledge the obvious – that a drone had done the task or that the C.I.A. was involved. Nor would the Obama administration provide the public with details on the policy behind an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>When a U.S. drone strike killed a U.S. citizen in Yemen who was a prominent al Qaeda terrorist, President Barack Obama would not acknowledge the obvious – that a drone had done the task or that the C.I.A. was involved.</p>
<p>Nor would the Obama administration provide the public with details on the policy behind an execution of an American citizen without due process. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary in<em> <strong>The New York Times</strong></em>, October 4, 2011, by Scott Shane.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/05/us/politics/awlaki-killing-is-awash-in-open-secrets.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.nytimes.com/2011/10/05/us/politics/awlaki-killing-is-awash-in-open-secrets.html?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/drone-strikes-out-in-open-but-still-classified-and-not-subject-to-discussion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study suggests way to reduce government overclassification</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/study-suggests-way-to-reduce-government-overclassification/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/study-suggests-way-to-reduce-government-overclassification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access to Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classified information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overclassification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secrecy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=17266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
A report by the Brennan Center for Justice proposes a pilot program for the government to insure employees are accountable for improper classification decisions. The report calls for better training for employees on what should be classified. The report also suggests building in incentives for declassifying documents. -db From The Reporters Committee for Freedom of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>A report by the Brennan Center for Justice proposes a pilot program for the government to insure employees are accountable for improper classification decisions. The report calls for better training for employees on what should be classified.</p>
<p>The report also suggests building in incentives for declassifying documents. -db</p>
<p>From <em><strong>The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press</strong></em>, October 5, 2011, by J.C. Derrick.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=12181" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=12181&amp;referer=');">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2011/10/study-suggests-way-to-reduce-government-overclassification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

