<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>First Amendment Coalition &#187; Freedom of Speech / Press</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/category/resources/freedom-of-speech-press/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org</link>
	<description>Defending Your Freedom of Speech &#38; Right to Know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:14:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Shareholders want transparency on politicking</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/shareholders-want-transparency-on-politicking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/shareholders-want-transparency-on-politicking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizen United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate spending on elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pepsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super PACs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
Shareholders of AT&#38;T, Apple, Ford and Pepsi are among the shareholders demanding to know how much money the corporations are spending on super PACs and lobbying. The demands are fueled in part by the U.S. Supreme Court&#8217;s decision Citizens United v. FEC that allowed unlimited and anonymous corporate spending. -db From Politico, February 7, 2012, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>Shareholders of AT&amp;T, Apple, Ford and Pepsi are among the shareholders demanding to know how much money the corporations are spending on super PACs and lobbying.</p>
<p>The demands are fueled in part by the U.S. Supreme Court&#8217;s decision Citizens United v. FEC that allowed unlimited and anonymous corporate spending. -db</p>
<p>From <strong><em>Politico</em></strong>, February 7, 2012, by David Saleh Rauf.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0212/72587.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.politico.com/news/stories/0212/72587.html?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/shareholders-want-transparency-on-politicking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free speech: Georgia Supreme Court throws out law outlawing assisted suicide</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/free-speech-georgia-supreme-court-throws-out-law-outlawing-assisted-suicide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/free-speech-georgia-supreme-court-throws-out-law-outlawing-assisted-suicide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assisted suicide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctor-assisted suicide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Final Exit Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patients Rights Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preservation of human life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The Georgia Supreme Court ruled that a law outlawing assisted suicide was an unconstitutional violation of free speech in that it made it a crime to promote assisted suicide. -db From The New York Times, February 6, 2012, by Kim Severson. Full story]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The Georgia Supreme Court ruled that a law outlawing assisted suicide was an unconstitutional violation of free speech in that it made it a crime to promote assisted suicide. -db</p>
<p>From <em><strong>The New York Times</strong></em>, February 6, 2012, by Kim Severson.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/07/us/assisted-suicide-law-is-overturned-by-georgia-supreme-court.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.nytimes.com/2012/02/07/us/assisted-suicide-law-is-overturned-by-georgia-supreme-court.html?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/free-speech-georgia-supreme-court-throws-out-law-outlawing-assisted-suicide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Afghan war army officer defies chain of command in reporting &#8216;truth&#8217; about war</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/afghan-war-army-officer-defies-chain-of-command-in-reporting-truth-about-war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/afghan-war-army-officer-defies-chain-of-command-in-reporting-truth-about-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghan war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[can-do optimism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence assessments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mr. Smith Goes to Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistleblowers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
After two years of deployment in Afghanistan, Lt. Col. Daniel L Davis concluded that the war was not going well and that the establishment was not telling the truth about the situation. He filed two reports with the Defense Department&#8217;s inspector general summarizing his observations and briefed members of Congress and  a New York Times [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>After two years of deployment in Afghanistan, Lt. Col. Daniel L Davis concluded that the war was not going well and that the establishment was not telling the truth about the situation.</p>
<p>He filed two reports with the Defense Department&#8217;s inspector general summarizing his observations and briefed members of Congress and  a <em>New York Times</em> reporter. He did all this without the knowledge of his military superiors. -db</p>
<p>From <strong><em>The New York Times</em></strong>, February 5, 2012, by Scott Shane.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/06/world/asia/army-colonel-challenges-pentagons-afghanistan-claims.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.nytimes.com/2012/02/06/world/asia/army-colonel-challenges-pentagons-afghanistan-claims.html?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/afghan-war-army-officer-defies-chain-of-command-in-reporting-truth-about-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Amendment Center presents Romney&#8217;s views on First Amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/first-amendment-center-presents-romneys-views-on-first-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/first-amendment-center-presents-romneys-views-on-first-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
Stances against campaign finance limits and the online piracy act are among Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney&#8217;s  views on First Amendment issues detailed in a roundup for the First Amendment Center. -db From the First Amendment Center, February 1, 2012, by Josh Tatum with research by Courtney Holliday. Full story &#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>Stances against campaign finance limits and the online piracy act are among Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney&#8217;s  views on First Amendment issues detailed in a roundup for the <em>First Amendment Center</em>. -db</p>
<p>From the <strong><em>First Amendment Center</em></strong>, February 1, 2012, by Josh Tatum with research by Courtney Holliday.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/romney%E2%80%99s-record-on-first-amendment-issues-religion-and-more" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.firstamendmentcenter.org/romney_E2_80_99s-record-on-first-amendment-issues-religion-and-more?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/first-amendment-center-presents-romneys-views-on-first-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chicago Tribune censors Doonesbury again</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/chicago-tribune-censors-doonesbury-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/chicago-tribune-censors-doonesbury-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Tribune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DonorsChoose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doonesbury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garry Trudeau]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The Chicago Tribune pulled the  DonorsChoose cartoon in the Doonesbury strip on the grounds that the cartoon promoted cartoonist Garry Trudeau&#8217;s self-interest in making an appeal for a particular charity contrary to Tribune policy. Trudeau disputed that the cartoon ws in his self interest since the appeal was for a charity that he was not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The <em>Chicago Tribune</em> pulled the  DonorsChoose cartoon in the Doonesbury strip on the grounds that the cartoon promoted cartoonist Garry Trudeau&#8217;s self-interest in making an appeal for a particular charity contrary to <em>Tribune</em> policy.</p>
<p>Trudeau disputed that the cartoon ws in his self interest since the appeal was for a charity that he was not connected with. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary in<em></em><strong><em> The Washington Post</em></strong>, February 6, 2012, by Michael Cavna.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/comic-riffs/post/doonesbury-pulled-because-of-charity-trudeau-responds-to-chicago-tribunes-decision-not-to-run-donorschoose-cartoon/2012/02/06/gIQAqPdztQ_blog.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/comic-riffs/post/doonesbury-pulled-because-of-charity-trudeau-responds-to-chicago-tribunes-decision-not-to-run-donorschoose-cartoon/2012/02/06/gIQAqPdztQ_blog.html?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/chicago-tribune-censors-doonesbury-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal judge upholds ban on &#8216;I (Heart) Boobies&#8217; breast cancer awareness bracelets in middle school</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/federal-judge-upholds-ban-on-i-heart-boobies-breast-cancer-awareness-bracelets-in-middle-school/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/federal-judge-upholds-ban-on-i-heart-boobies-breast-cancer-awareness-bracelets-in-middle-school/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bethel v. Fraser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I (Heart) Boobies bracelet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offensive speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulgar speech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
A federal judge ruled against a Wisconsin middle school student who sued the Sauk Prairie School District on First Amendment grounds for banning the &#8220;I (Heart) Boobies&#8221; bracelet. The judge said the district could ban vulgar or offensive speech under the U.S. Supreme Court&#8217;s Bethel v. Fraser precedent. -db From the Student Press Law Center, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>A federal judge ruled against a Wisconsin middle school student who sued the Sauk Prairie School District on First Amendment grounds for banning the &#8220;I (Heart) Boobies&#8221; bracelet.</p>
<p>The judge said the district could ban vulgar or offensive speech under the U.S. Supreme Court&#8217;s Bethel v. Fraser precedent. -db</p>
<p>From the<em><strong> Student Press Law Center</strong></em>, February 7, 2012, by Brian Schraum.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.splc.org/news/newsflash.asp?id=2327" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.splc.org/news/newsflash.asp?id=2327&amp;referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/federal-judge-upholds-ban-on-i-heart-boobies-breast-cancer-awareness-bracelets-in-middle-school/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former General Electric employee claims he was fired for whistleblowing in Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/former-employee-of-general-electric-claims-he-was-fired-for-blowing-whistle-in-iraq/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/former-employee-of-general-electric-claims-he-was-fired-for-blowing-whistle-in-iraq/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Corrupt Practices Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Electric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistleblowing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
A former executive for General Electric in Iraq claims he was fired for warning about a possible violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act while the company was striving for a huge contract with the Iraqi government. GE denies that the former employee was fired for his whistleblowing. -db From the Courthouse News Service, February [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>A former executive for General Electric in Iraq claims he was fired for warning about a possible violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act while the company was striving for a huge contract with the Iraqi government.</p>
<p>GE denies that the former employee was fired for his whistleblowing. -db</p>
<p>From the <strong><em>Courthouse News Service</em></strong>, February 7, 2012, by Cameron Langford.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/02/07/43685.htm" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.courthousenews.com/2012/02/07/43685.htm?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/former-employee-of-general-electric-claims-he-was-fired-for-blowing-whistle-in-iraq/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Amendment defenders line up against Stolen Valor Act</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/first-amendment-defenders-line-up-against-stolen-valor-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/first-amendment-defenders-line-up-against-stolen-valor-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminalizing lying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medal of Honor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCFOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stolen Valor Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
A number of free speech defenders have filed briefs to the U.S. Supreme Court contesting the constitutionality of the Stolen Valor Act. The briefs were filed in support of a Pomona, California water district board member who lied about receiving the Medal of Honor and 25 years of service in the Marines. -db From the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>A number of free speech defenders have filed briefs to the U.S. Supreme Court contesting the constitutionality of the Stolen Valor Act.</p>
<p>The briefs were filed in support of a Pomona, California water district board member who lied about receiving the Medal of Honor and 25 years of service in the Marines. -db</p>
<p>From the <strong><em>Courthouse News Service</em></strong>, February 06, 2012, by Tim Hull.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/02/06/43671.htm" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.courthousenews.com/2012/02/06/43671.htm?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/first-amendment-defenders-line-up-against-stolen-valor-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free speech: Federal judge gives &#8216;Sister Wives&#8217; family okay to contest Utah&#8217;s anti-bigamy law</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/free-speech-federal-judge-gives-sister-wives-family-okay-to-contest-utahs-anti-bigamy-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/free-speech-federal-judge-gives-sister-wives-family-okay-to-contest-utahs-anti-bigamy-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apostolic United Brethren Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bigamy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plural marriages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polygamy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sister Wives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TLC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
A federal judge ruled that the &#8220;Sister Wives family could proceed with their lawsuit challenging Utah&#8217;s anti-polygamy law. Because Utah&#8217;s Attorney General said the family would be prosecuted under the state&#8217;s bigamy law, the judge said there was a &#8220;chilling effect&#8221; on the family&#8217;s First Amendment rights. -db From The Hollywood Reporter, February 4, 2012, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>A federal judge ruled that the &#8220;Sister Wives family could proceed with their lawsuit challenging Utah&#8217;s anti-polygamy law.</p>
<p>Because Utah&#8217;s Attorney General said the family would be prosecuted under the state&#8217;s bigamy law, the judge said there was a &#8220;chilling effect&#8221; on the family&#8217;s First Amendment rights. -db</p>
<p>From <strong><em>The Hollywood Reporter</em></strong>, February 4, 2012, by Aaron Couch.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/sister-wives-lawsuit-kody-brown-287143" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/sister-wives-lawsuit-kody-brown-287143?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/free-speech-federal-judge-gives-sister-wives-family-okay-to-contest-utahs-anti-bigamy-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oregon company argues that blogger who allegedly defamed it does not deserve new trial</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/oregon-company-argues-that-blogger-who-allegedly-defamed-it-does-not-deserve-new-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/oregon-company-argues-that-blogger-who-allegedly-defamed-it-does-not-deserve-new-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EFF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obsidian Finance Group]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
Obsidian Finance Group who won a round in court against a blogger for defamation says the blogger does not deserve a new trial. A court awarded Obsidian$2.5 million in damages for one post. The blogger is seeking to appeal the award with the Electric Frontier Foundation filing an amicus brief arguing the judgment was a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>Obsidian Finance Group who won a round in court against a blogger for defamation says the blogger does not deserve a new trial. A court awarded Obsidian$2.5 million in damages for one post.</p>
<p>The blogger is seeking to appeal the award with the <em>Electric Frontier Foundation</em> filing an amicus brief arguing the judgment was a threat to free speech. -db</p>
<p>From the <strong><em>Courthouse News Service</em></strong>, February 6, 2012, by Nick McCann.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/02/06/43647.htm" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.courthousenews.com/2012/02/06/43647.htm?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/oregon-company-argues-that-blogger-who-allegedly-defamed-it-does-not-deserve-new-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free speech challenge to school ban on religious messages can proceed</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/free-speech-challenge-to-school-ban-on-religious-messages-can-proceed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/free-speech-challenge-to-school-ban-on-religious-messages-can-proceed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Religious Freedom Restoration Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
A federal judge gave the go-ahead to a lawsuit brought by three families claiming a school district violated the free speech rights of their children seeking to hand out candy cane pens stamped with religious messages. -db From the Courthouse News Service, February 6, 2012, by Bonnie Barron. Full story &#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>A federal judge gave the go-ahead to a lawsuit brought by three families claiming a school district violated the free speech rights of their children seeking to hand out candy cane pens stamped with religious messages. -db</p>
<p>From the <strong><em>Courthouse News Service</em></strong>, February 6, 2012, by Bonnie Barron.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/02/06/43664.htm" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.courthousenews.com/2012/02/06/43664.htm?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/free-speech-challenge-to-school-ban-on-religious-messages-can-proceed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Military retaliates against whistleblowers at mortuary for war dead</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/military-retaliates-against-whistleblowers-at-mortuary-for-war-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/military-retaliates-against-whistleblowers-at-mortuary-for-war-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dover Air Force Base]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office of Special Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war dead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistleblowers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
Officials at a mortuary at Dover Air Force Base, the entry for U.S. war dead, punished four employees for voicing concerns about the  mishandling of service members&#8217; remains. The Office of Special Counsel investigated the incident and is giving the Air Force 30 days to punish officials for retaliating against the whistleblowers. -db From The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>Officials at a mortuary at Dover Air Force Base, the entry for U.S. war dead, punished four employees for voicing concerns about the  mishandling of service members&#8217; remains.</p>
<p>The Office of Special Counsel investigated the incident and is giving the Air Force 30 days to punish officials for retaliating against the whistleblowers. -db</p>
<p>From <strong><em>The New York Ti</em><em>mes</em></strong>, February 1, 2012, by James Dao.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/01/us/whistle-blowers-disciplined-at-dover-air-base-mortuary.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=print" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.nytimes.com/2012/02/01/us/whistle-blowers-disciplined-at-dover-air-base-mortuary.html?_r=1_amp_pagewanted=print&amp;referer=');">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/military-retaliates-against-whistleblowers-at-mortuary-for-war-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. senator begins investigation into treatment of FDA whistleblowers</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/u-s-senator-begins-investigation-into-treatment-of-fda-whistleblowers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/u-s-senator-begins-investigation-into-treatment-of-fda-whistleblowers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance of e-mails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistleblowers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
After six current or former Food and Drug Administration employees complained that their e-mails were being monitored, Senator Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) ordered an investigation into the FDA&#8217;s monitoring program aimed at doctors and scientists alarmed that unsafe medical devices were approved. Grassley said, “I write to express my concerns over your agency’s treatment of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>After six current or former Food and Drug Administration employees complained that their e-mails were being monitored, Senator Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) ordered an investigation into the FDA&#8217;s monitoring program aimed at doctors and scientists alarmed that unsafe medical devices were approved.</p>
<p>Grassley said, “I write to express my concerns over your agency’s treatment of whistleblowers as a result of their disclosures to Congress, and specifically disclosures to my office. Whistleblowers . . . are often treated like skunks at a picnic.” -db</p>
<p>From <strong><em>The Washington Post</em></strong>, February 1, 2012, by Lisa Rein and Ellen Nakashima.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/fda-monitoring-of-whistleblowers-probed/2012/02/01/gIQAqjc2iQ_story.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.washingtonpost.com/politics/fda-monitoring-of-whistleblowers-probed/2012/02/01/gIQAqjc2iQ_story.html?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/u-s-senator-begins-investigation-into-treatment-of-fda-whistleblowers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Student Press Law Center protests banning of Arizona school books</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/student-press-law-center-protests-banning-of-arizona-school-books/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/student-press-law-center-protests-banning-of-arizona-school-books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banning books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethnic history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPLC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
Together with other free speech groups, the Student Press Law Center is opposing the removal of ethnic history books from the Tucson, Arizona schools. The school district banned the books under a state law that prohibits courses of study that are &#8220;designed primarily for pupils of a particular ethnic group.&#8221; “The Supreme Court has told [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>Together with other free speech groups, the <em>Student Press Law Center</em> is opposing the removal of ethnic history books from the Tucson, Arizona schools. The school district banned the books under a state law that prohibits courses of study that are &#8220;designed primarily for pupils of a particular ethnic group.&#8221;</p>
<p>“The Supreme Court has told us repeatedly, as recently as last term, that young people have a constitutional right to receive information that cannot lightly be overridden by the government,” said attorney Frank D. LoMonte, executive director of the Student Press Law Center. -db</p>
<p>From a press release from the <strong><em>Student Press Law Center</em></strong>, January 30, 2012.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.splc.org/news/newsflash.asp?id=2324" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.splc.org/news/newsflash.asp?id=2324&amp;referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/student-press-law-center-protests-banning-of-arizona-school-books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EFF wants protection for anonymous in porn-downloading suit</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/eff-wants-protection-for-anonymous-in-porn-downloading-suit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/eff-wants-protection-for-anonymous-in-porn-downloading-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catch 22]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[due process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EFF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hard Drive Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The Electronic Frontier Foundation is petitioning a federal judge to protect the anonymity of individuals involved in a copyright lawsuit over porn downloading. An adult film company wants to determine the identities of 1495 Internet users. The judge ordered the individuals suing to protect their anonymity to reveal their identities before the suit could proceed. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The Electronic Frontier Foundation is petitioning a federal judge to protect the anonymity of individuals involved in a copyright lawsuit over porn downloading.</p>
<p>An adult film company wants to determine the identities of 1495 Internet users. The judge ordered the individuals suing to protect their anonymity to reveal their identities before the suit could proceed. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary for the <strong><em>Electronic Frontier Foundation</em></strong>, January 30, 2012.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.eff.org/press/releases/eff-asks-judge-prevent-%E2%80%98catch-22%E2%80%99-porn-downloading-lawsuit" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.eff.org/press/releases/eff-asks-judge-prevent-_E2_80_98catch-22_E2_80_99-porn-downloading-lawsuit?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/eff-wants-protection-for-anonymous-in-porn-downloading-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reporters group disappointed in federal appeals court decision over access to Virginia state records</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/reporters-group-disappointed-in-federal-appeals-court-decision-over-access-to-virginia-state-records/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/reporters-group-disappointed-in-federal-appeals-court-decision-over-access-to-virginia-state-records/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access to Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunshine Ordinances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McBurney v. Young]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCFOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VFOIA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The Reporters Committee  for Freedom of the Press did not like a federal appeals decision upholding a law restricting access to Virginia state records by non-residents. The court ruled that the restriction was not unconstitutional. The Reporters Committee felt the court should have considered the effect of the restriction on smaller journalistic enterprises. -db From [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The Reporters Committee  for Freedom of the Press did not like a federal appeals decision upholding a law restricting access to Virginia state records by non-residents. The court ruled that the restriction was not unconstitutional.</p>
<p>The Reporters Committee felt the court should have considered the effect of the restriction on smaller journalistic enterprises. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary by<em><strong> The Reporters Committee  for Freedom of the Press</strong></em>, February 1, 2012.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rcfp.org/reporters-committee-surprised-decision-restricting-va-government-info-residents" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.rcfp.org/reporters-committee-surprised-decision-restricting-va-government-info-residents?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/reporters-group-disappointed-in-federal-appeals-court-decision-over-access-to-virginia-state-records/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal court rules non-residents can be denied Virginia state records</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/federal-court-rules-non-residents-can-be-denied-virginia-state-records/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/federal-court-rules-non-residents-can-be-denied-virginia-state-records/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access to Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dormant commerce clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interstate commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public's right to know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCFOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VFOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that non-residents have no right to Virginia public records under the state&#8217;s freedom of information law. Non-residents were challenging the law claiming it was unconstitutional. The two non-residents who sued the state were seeking child support documents and real estate tax assessment records. -db From The Reporters [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that non-residents have no right to Virginia public records under the state&#8217;s freedom of information law. Non-residents were challenging the law claiming it was unconstitutional.</p>
<p>The two non-residents who sued the state were seeking child support documents and real estate tax assessment records. -db</p>
<p>From <strong><em>The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press</em></strong>, February 1, 2012, by You-Jin Han.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rcfp.org/browse-media-law-resources/news/appeals-court-restricts-records-access-non-virginians" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.rcfp.org/browse-media-law-resources/news/appeals-court-restricts-records-access-non-virginians?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/02/federal-court-rules-non-residents-can-be-denied-virginia-state-records/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gay police officer loses right to make First Amendment case after he was hounded out of the department</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/gay-police-officer-loses-right-to-make-first-amendment-case-after-he-was-hounded-out-of-the-department/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/gay-police-officer-loses-right-to-make-first-amendment-case-after-he-was-hounded-out-of-the-department/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lathrop v. St. Cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twin Cities Pride Festival]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
A gay police officer who alleged that St. Cloud Police Department refused to allow him his First Amendment rights to work in the Twin Cities Pride Festival even if he used his vacation time lost a bid in federal court on the First Amendment claim. The court did say there was sufficient evidence to pursue [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>A gay police officer who alleged that St. Cloud Police Department refused to allow him his First Amendment rights to work in the Twin Cities Pride Festival even if he used his vacation time lost a bid in federal court on the First Amendment claim.</p>
<p>The court did say there was sufficient evidence to pursue an equal protection claim. -db</p>
<p>From the <strong><em>First Amendment Center</em></strong>, January 30, 2012, by David L. Hudson Jr.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/gay-police-officers-first-amendment-claim-dismissed" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.firstamendmentcenter.org/gay-police-officers-first-amendment-claim-dismissed?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/gay-police-officer-loses-right-to-make-first-amendment-case-after-he-was-hounded-out-of-the-department/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Illinois case greater threat to bloggers seeking protection of shield laws</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/illinois-case-greater-threat-to-bloggers-seeking-protection-of-shield-laws/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/illinois-case-greater-threat-to-bloggers-seeking-protection-of-shield-laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LLC v. Cox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O'Grady v. Superior Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shield laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The Oregon case denying a blogger protection under the state;&#8217;s shield is of minor concern writes Eric P. Robinson for the Citizen Media Law Project. A greater threat lies in a recent decision in Illinois. In that case the Cook County court ruled that an online news source that posted blogs on technology did not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The Oregon case denying a blogger protection under the state;&#8217;s shield is of minor concern writes Eric P. Robinson for the <em>Citizen Media Law Project</em>. A greater threat lies in a recent decision in Illinois.</p>
<p>In that case the Cook County court ruled that an online news source that posted blogs on technology did not qualify as a &#8220;news medium&#8221; and did not therefore enjoy Illinois reporter&#8217;s privilege. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary for the <em><strong>Citizen Media Law Project</strong></em>, January 26, 2012, by Eric P. Robinson.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2012/bloggers-and-shield-laws-ii-now-you-can-worry" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2012/bloggers-and-shield-laws-ii-now-you-can-worry?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/illinois-case-greater-threat-to-bloggers-seeking-protection-of-shield-laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul loses bid for identities of those posting online spoof</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/republic-presidential-candidate-ron-paul-loses-bid-for-identities-of-those-posting-online-spoof/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/republic-presidential-candidate-ron-paul-loses-bid-for-identities-of-those-posting-online-spoof/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul 2012 v. Does]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spoof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
A federal judge ruled that Republican presidential contender Ron Paul could not force YouTube and Twitter to provide the identities of whoever uploaded videos with a spoof of Ron Paul bashing former candidate Jon Huntsman for being a Chinese agent. It is unusual for a candidate to sue in these matters given the courts&#8217; tolerance [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>A federal judge ruled that Republican presidential contender Ron Paul could not force YouTube and Twitter to provide the identities of whoever uploaded videos with a spoof of Ron Paul bashing former candidate Jon Huntsman for being a Chinese agent.</p>
<p>It is unusual for a candidate to sue in these matters given the courts&#8217; tolerance of robust give and take in presidential campaigns, writes Jeff Roberts in <em>paidContent</em>. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary in<strong></strong><em><strong> paidContent</strong></em>, January 26, 2012, by Jeff Roberts.</p>
<p><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-judge-ron-paul-cant-force-twitter-youtube-to-identify-impostors/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/paidcontent.org/article/419-judge-ron-paul-cant-force-twitter-youtube-to-identify-impostors/?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/republic-presidential-candidate-ron-paul-loses-bid-for-identities-of-those-posting-online-spoof/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doctors uneasy about online complaints attempt to stifle criticism</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/doctors-uneasy-about-online-complaints-attempt-to-stifle-criticism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/doctors-uneasy-about-online-complaints-attempt-to-stifle-criticism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angie's List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critical reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoctorBase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RateMDs.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reputation.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yelp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
Writing critical reviews of doctors and dentists online could make you the target of a defamation lawsuit as medical professionals try to stifle negative comments. Some doctors are asking patients to sign gag orders to prevent online comments while the sites are publishing the names of doctors using gag order forms and providing patients with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>Writing critical reviews of doctors and dentists online could make you the target of a defamation lawsuit as medical professionals try to stifle negative comments.</p>
<p>Some doctors are asking patients to sign gag orders to prevent online comments while the sites are publishing the names of doctors using gag order forms and providing patients with access to legal resources if they are threatened. -db</p>
<p>From the <strong><em>The Washington Post</em></strong>, January 28, 2012, by Dina ElBoghdady.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/some-doctors-try-to-squelch-online-reviews/2011/11/29/gIQA2KQhYQ_story.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/some-doctors-try-to-squelch-online-reviews/2011/11/29/gIQA2KQhYQ_story.html?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/doctors-uneasy-about-online-complaints-attempt-to-stifle-criticism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal appeals court upholds Stolen Valor Act</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/federal-appeals-court-upholds-stolen-valor-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/federal-appeals-court-upholds-stolen-valor-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stolen Valor Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
After the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the Stolen Valor Act unconstitutional in a separate case, the 10th Circuit upheld the law which prohibits lying about military awards. The opinion of the 10th Circuit judges cited a statement from a Supreme Court ruling that false statements do not get constitutional protection, &#8220;except to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>After the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the Stolen Valor Act unconstitutional in a separate case, the 10th Circuit upheld the law which prohibits lying about military awards.</p>
<p>The opinion of the 10th Circuit judges cited a statement from a Supreme Court ruling that false statements do not get constitutional protection, &#8220;except to the extent necessary to protect more valuable speech.&#8221; -db</p>
<p>From <em><strong>The Denver Post</strong></em>, January 27, 2012, by John Ingold.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_19835791?source=rss" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_19835791?source=rss&amp;referer=');">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/federal-appeals-court-upholds-stolen-valor-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opinion: NBC TV station obliged to run Romney ad the network objects to</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/opinion-nbc-tv-station-obliged-to-run-romney-ad-the-network-objects-to/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/opinion-nbc-tv-station-obliged-to-run-romney-ad-the-network-objects-to/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political ads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
After NBC TV station continued to air a Mitt Romney ad that the network wants pulled, they were charged with hypocrisy, but says Josh Gerstein in Politico, it&#8217;s not that the stations would sell out principles to make a buck, FCC rules say that stations have to take ads on a comparable basis from all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>After NBC TV station continued to air a Mitt Romney ad that the network wants pulled, they were charged with hypocrisy, but says Josh Gerstein in <em>Politico</em>, it&#8217;s not that the stations would sell out principles to make a buck, FCC rules say that stations have to take ads on a comparable basis from all viable candidates. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary in <strong><em>Politico</em></strong>, January 29 2012, by Josh Gerstein.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/opinion-nbc-tv-station-obliged-to-run-romney-ad-the-network-objects-to/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal appeals court hands censorship tool to public colleges</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/federal-appeals-court-hands-censorship-tool-to-public-colleges/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/federal-appeals-court-hands-censorship-tool-to-public-colleges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hazelwood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hosty v. Carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ward v Polite]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals extended the Supreme Court ruling known as Hazelwood to public colleges and universities while ruling on a case over the expulsion of a student in a counseling program at Eastern Michigan University. Hazelwood allows school administrators to censor student expression on the grounds of “legitimate pedagogical concerns.” -db [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals extended the Supreme Court ruling known as Hazelwood to public colleges and universities while ruling on a case over the expulsion of a student in a counseling program at Eastern Michigan University.</p>
<p>Hazelwood allows school administrators to censor student expression on the grounds of “legitimate pedagogical concerns.” -db</p>
<p>From the <strong><em>Student Press Law Center</em></strong>, January 27, 2012, by Nick Glunt.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.splc.org/news/newsflash.asp?id=2323" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.splc.org/news/newsflash.asp?id=2323&amp;referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/federal-appeals-court-hands-censorship-tool-to-public-colleges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Public has options in dealing with Twitter&#8217;s new country-specific censorship</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/public-has-options-in-dealing-with-twitters-new-country-specific-censorship/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/public-has-options-in-dealing-with-twitters-new-country-specific-censorship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chilling Effects Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
After Twitter announced last week they would engage in country-specific censorship, EFF&#8217;s Eva Galperin says there are ways to fight the plan including checking to see if Twitter makes use of the Chilling Effects Project which publishes a country&#8217;s censorship orders and puts it in an archive. Galperin also says that a user can circumvent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>After Twitter announced last week they would engage in country-specific censorship, <em>EFF&#8217;s</em> Eva Galperin says there are ways to fight the plan including checking to see if Twitter makes use of the Chilling Effects Project which publishes a country&#8217;s censorship orders and puts it in an archive.</p>
<p>Galperin also says that a user can circumvent the censorship by changing the country listed in their profile. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary for the <strong><em>Electronic Frontier Foundation</em></strong>, January 27, 2012, by Eva Galperin.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/01/what-does-twitter%E2%80%99s-country-country-takedown-system-mean-freedom-expression" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/01/what-does-twitter_E2_80_99s-country-country-takedown-system-mean-freedom-expression?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/public-has-options-in-dealing-with-twitters-new-country-specific-censorship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter censorship plan provokes outrage</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/twitter-censorship-plan-provokes-outrage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/twitter-censorship-plan-provokes-outrage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dissidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press freedom index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reporters Without Borders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
To cries of protest, Twitter announced last week that it will take a country&#8217;s laws and culture into account in conducting country-specific censorship. Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, who is also the second largest shareholder in News Corp., recently invested $300 million in Twitter. -db From the Courthouse News Service, January 27, 2012, by Adam [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>To cries of protest, Twitter announced last week that it will take a country&#8217;s laws and culture into account in conducting country-specific censorship.</p>
<p>Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, who is also the second largest shareholder in News Corp., recently invested $300 million in Twitter. -db</p>
<p>From the <em><strong>Courthouse News Service</strong></em>, January 27, 2012, by Adam Klasfeld.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/01/27/43420.htm" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.courthousenews.com/2012/01/27/43420.htm?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/twitter-censorship-plan-provokes-outrage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Family sues Hustler for $20 million for publishing nude photos after death</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/family-sues-hustler-for-20-million-for-publishing-nude-photos-after-her-death/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/family-sues-hustler-for-20-million-for-publishing-nude-photos-after-her-death/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newsworthy figure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public figure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Wrestling Entertainment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
A grieving family is suing Hustler Magazine for $20 million after the magazine published nude photos of a model who was murdered by her husband. Hustler is claiming that the model was a public figure and newsworthy. -db From the  Daily Mail, January 26, 2012, by Daily Mail Reporter. Full story &#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>A grieving family is suing <em>Hustler Magazine</em> for $20 million after the magazine published nude photos of a model who was murdered by her husband.</p>
<p><em>Hustler</em> is claiming that the model was a public figure and newsworthy. -db</p>
<p>From the  <strong><em>Daily Mail</em></strong>, January 26, 2012, by <em>Daily Mail</em> Reporter.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2091891/Family-appeals-20M-verdict-Hustler-magazine-published-nude-photos-Nancy-Benoit-murdered-wrestler-husband.html?ITO=1490" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2091891/Family-appeals-20M-verdict-Hustler-magazine-published-nude-photos-Nancy-Benoit-murdered-wrestler-husband.html?ITO=1490&amp;referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/family-sues-hustler-for-20-million-for-publishing-nude-photos-after-her-death/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. press freedom plummeted in 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/u-s-press-freedom-plummeted-in-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/u-s-press-freedom-plummeted-in-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[espionage prosecutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press freedom index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reporters Without Borders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistleblower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistlle blowers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
Press freedom took a hit in the United States in 2011 according to Reporters Without Borders who ranked contries according to their performance. The U.S. now shares 47th place in a tie with Romania and Argentina. Much of the drop may be based on the harassment, beating and arrest of journalists covering Occupy Wall Street [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>Press freedom took a hit in the United States in 2011 according to Reporters Without Borders who ranked contries according to their performance.</p>
<p>The U.S. now shares 47th place in a tie with Romania and Argentina. Much of the drop may be based on the harassment, beating and arrest of journalists covering Occupy Wall Street protests. -db</p>
<p>From the <strong><em>Courthouse News Service</em></strong>, January 26, 2012, by Adam Klasfeld.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/01/26/43356.htm" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.courthousenews.com/2012/01/26/43356.htm?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/u-s-press-freedom-plummeted-in-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal appeals court rules Albuquerque public library must allow sex offenders</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/federal-appeals-court-rules-albuquerque-public-library-must-allow-sex-offenders/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/federal-appeals-court-rules-albuquerque-public-library-must-allow-sex-offenders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doe v. Albuquerque]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex offenders]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The 10th Circuit Appellate Court upheld a lower court decision that Albuquerque&#8217;s ban on registered sex offenders in public libraries violates the First Amendment. The court ruled that the ban was too restrictive and did not allow alternative means for sex offenders to gain access to the library&#8217;s information and ideas. -db From the First [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The 10th Circuit Appellate Court upheld a lower court decision that Albuquerque&#8217;s ban on registered sex offenders in public libraries violates the First Amendment.</p>
<p>The court ruled that the ban was too restrictive and did not allow alternative means for sex offenders to gain access to the library&#8217;s information and ideas. -db</p>
<p>From the <em><strong>First Amendment Center</strong></em>, January 26, 2012,by David L. Hudson Jr.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/10th-circuit-rejects-library-ban-on-sex-offenders" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.firstamendmentcenter.org/10th-circuit-rejects-library-ban-on-sex-offenders?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/federal-appeals-court-rules-albuquerque-public-library-must-allow-sex-offenders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Carolina prison newsletter wins censorship suit</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/south-carolina-prison-newsletter-wins-censorship-suit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/south-carolina-prison-newsletter-wins-censorship-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prison Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prison mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prison reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prison rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prison security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
A South Carolina county will have to pony up nearly $600,000 to settle a censorship lawsuit brought by a group who publishes a monthly newsletter for prison inmates. Before the settlement, prison officials at a county detention center only allowed inmates religious texts for reading materials. -db From the First Amendment Center, January 26, 2012, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>A South Carolina county will have to pony up nearly $600,000 to settle a censorship lawsuit brought by a group who publishes a monthly newsletter for prison inmates.</p>
<p>Before the settlement, prison officials at a county detention center only allowed inmates religious texts for reading materials. -db</p>
<p>From the<strong><em> First Amendment Center</em></strong>, January 26, 2012, by David L. Hudson Jr.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/s-c-county-to-pay-almost-600k-to-settle-jail-censorship-suit" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.firstamendmentcenter.org/s-c-county-to-pay-almost-600k-to-settle-jail-censorship-suit?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/south-carolina-prison-newsletter-wins-censorship-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sikh leader sues comedian Jay Leno for defamation in Mitt Romney joke</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/sikh-leader-sues-comedian-jay-leno-for-defamation-in-mitt-romney-joke/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/sikh-leader-sues-comedian-jay-leno-for-defamation-in-mitt-romney-joke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Golden Temple Holy Shrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Leno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sikhs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Tonight Show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
As Jay Leno was joking on &#8220;The Tonight Show&#8221;about Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney&#8217;s wealth, a picture of the Sikh&#8217;s  Golden Temple Holy Shrine appeared on a screen. A Sikh religious leader filed a lawsuit against Leno and NBC claiming the Leno joke was false and brought Sikhs into public hatred, contempt and ridicule. -db [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>As Jay Leno was joking on &#8220;The Tonight Show&#8221;about Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney&#8217;s wealth, a picture of the Sikh&#8217;s  Golden Temple Holy Shrine appeared on a screen.</p>
<p>A Sikh religious leader filed a lawsuit against Leno and NBC claiming the Leno joke was false and brought Sikhs into public hatred, contempt and ridicule. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary in the <strong><em>Hollywood Reporter</em></strong>, January 25, 2012,  by Eriq Gardner.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jay-leno--mitt-romney-golden-temple-lawsuit-284795" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jay-leno--mitt-romney-golden-temple-lawsuit-284795?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/sikh-leader-sues-comedian-jay-leno-for-defamation-in-mitt-romney-joke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chicago Sun-Times abandons political endorsements</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/chicago-sun-times-abandons-political-endorsements/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/chicago-sun-times-abandons-political-endorsements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Sun-Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decline of journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political endorsements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA Today]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
In a recognition of its waning influence, the Chicago Sun-Times has decided to stop endorsing political candidates. As reasons for the move, it also says it wants to allow readers to decide for themselves and that it wants to appear nonpartisan. -db From The Atlantic Wire, January 23, 2-12, by Dino Grandoni. Full story &#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>In a recognition of its waning influence, the <em>Chicago Sun-Times</em> has decided to stop endorsing political candidates. As reasons for the move, it also says it wants to allow readers to decide for themselves and that it wants to appear nonpartisan. -db</p>
<p>From <strong><em>The Atlantic Wire</em></strong>, January 23, 2-12, by Dino Grandoni.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/business/2012/01/chicago-sun-times-doubting-its-relevance-drops-political-endorsements/47716/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.theatlanticwire.com/business/2012/01/chicago-sun-times-doubting-its-relevance-drops-political-endorsements/47716/?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/chicago-sun-times-abandons-political-endorsements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court police arrest man for &#8216;Occupy Everything&#8217; words on jacket</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/supreme-court-police-arrest-man-for-occupy-everything-words-on-jacket/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/supreme-court-police-arrest-man-for-occupy-everything-words-on-jacket/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cohen v. California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content-neutral law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fuck the Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Everything]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protest signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States v. Grace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unlawful entry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
In an incident reminiscent of  Cohen v. California, the Supreme Court police arrested a man in a corridor wearing a jacket with the words &#8220;Occupy Everything.&#8221; For the Citizen Media Law Project, Andrew F. Sellars analyzes the case finding little basis for the arrest. &#8220;Here, in the halls of the very building that brought us [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>In an incident reminiscent of  Cohen v. California, the Supreme Court police arrested a man in a corridor wearing a jacket with the words &#8220;Occupy Everything.&#8221;</p>
<p>For the <strong><em>Citizen Media Law Project</em></strong>, Andrew F. Sellars analyzes the case finding little basis for the arrest. &#8220;Here, in the halls of the very building that brought us Cohen, Grace, and every other major case which has safeguarded our liberties from the intrusion of government, we have absurd government intrusion, based on hypothetical harms, against a legitimate display of pure speech,&#8221; writes Sellars. -db</p>
<p>From a commentary for the <strong><em>Citizen Media Law Project</em></strong>, January 23, 2012, by Andrew F. Sellars.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2012/case-you-missed-it-first-time-supreme-court-police-reenact-cohen-v-california" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2012/case-you-missed-it-first-time-supreme-court-police-reenact-cohen-v-california?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/supreme-court-police-arrest-man-for-occupy-everything-words-on-jacket/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal judge rejects San Diego election campaign donation cap</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/federal-judge-rejects-san-diego-election-campaign-donation-cap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/federal-judge-rejects-san-diego-election-campaign-donation-cap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caps on campaign donations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
A federal judge ruled that San Diego could not enforce its $1000 cap on donations by political parties to local election campaigns. The city wanted to stem the San Diego&#8217;s corrupt political scene, but the judge said she doubted that the anti-corruption interest was credible given the natural connection between parties and candidates. -db From [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>A federal judge ruled that San Diego could not enforce its $1000 cap on donations by political parties to local election campaigns.</p>
<p>The city wanted to stem the San Diego&#8217;s corrupt political scene, but the judge said she doubted that the anti-corruption interest was credible given the natural connection between parties and candidates. -db</p>
<p>From the <strong><em>Courthouse News Service</em></strong>, January 23, 2012, by Maria Dinzeo.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/01/23/43260.htm" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.courthousenews.com/2012/01/23/43260.htm?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/federal-judge-rejects-san-diego-election-campaign-donation-cap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whistleblower sues over firing during BP gulf oil spill cleanup</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/whistleblower-sues-over-firing-during-bp-gulf-oil-spill-cleanup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/whistleblower-sues-over-firing-during-bp-gulf-oil-spill-cleanup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GCRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf oil spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil spill cleanup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STRs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistleblower]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
BP allegedly fired a worker for refusing to change data so that the company could claim the gulf oil spill cleanup was over and begin the restoration phase of the operation. The worker claimed a BP vice president said the announcement that the cleanup was over would provide a needed boost for BP stock prices. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>BP allegedly fired a worker for refusing to change data so that the company could claim the gulf oil spill cleanup was over and begin the restoration phase of the operation.</p>
<p>The worker claimed a BP vice president said the announcement that the cleanup was over would provide a needed boost for BP stock prices. -db</p>
<p>From the <strong><em>Courthouse News Service</em></strong>, January 24, 2012, by Sabrina Canfield.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/01/24/43278.htm" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.courthousenews.com/2012/01/24/43278.htm?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/whistleblower-sues-over-firing-during-bp-gulf-oil-spill-cleanup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government indicts former CIA officer for leaks of classfied information to journalists</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/government-indicts-former-cia-officer-for-leaks-of-classfied-information-to-journalists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/government-indicts-former-cia-officer-for-leaks-of-classfied-information-to-journalists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Gathering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classified information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Espionage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligence Identities Protection Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The Justice Department  is charging a former intelligence officer with leaking classified information to a journalist. The leaks included the names of covert officers and their work in apprehending terrorist suspects. The officer is charged with divulging to a New York Times reporter the contact information and details of activities of a covert CIA operative. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The Justice Department  is charging a former intelligence officer with leaking classified information to a journalist. The leaks included the names of covert officers and their work in apprehending terrorist suspects.</p>
<p>The officer is charged with divulging to a <em>New York Times</em> reporter the contact information and details of activities of a covert CIA operative. -db</p>
<p>From <strong><em>The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press</em></strong>, January 23, 20112, by Andrea Papagianis.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rcfp.org/browse-media-law-resources/news/former-cia-officer-charged-leaking-info-journalists" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.rcfp.org/browse-media-law-resources/news/former-cia-officer-charged-leaking-info-journalists?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/government-indicts-former-cia-officer-for-leaks-of-classfied-information-to-journalists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Muhammad Ali a central figure in unfolding of First Amendment rights</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/muhammad-ali-played-key-role-in-unfolding-of-modern-first-amendment-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/muhammad-ali-played-key-role-in-unfolding-of-modern-first-amendment-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clay v. United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muhammad Ali]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Times v. Sullivan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
Muhammad Ali, the former world heavyweight boxing champion, &#8220;embodies the essence of the First Amendment,&#8221; writes David L. Hudson Jr., of the First Amendment Center. Hudson shows how Ali was at the &#8220;vortex of&#8230;First Amendment freedoms,&#8221; freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly and petition.  -db From a commentary for the First Amendment Center, January 21, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>Muhammad Ali, the former world heavyweight boxing champion, &#8220;embodies the essence of the First Amendment,&#8221; writes David L. Hudson Jr., of the <em>First Amendment Center</em>.</p>
<p>Hudson shows how Ali was at the &#8220;vortex of&#8230;First Amendment freedoms,&#8221; freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly and petition.  -db</p>
<p>From a commentary for the <strong><em>First Amendment Center</em></strong>, January 21, 2012, by David L. Hudson Jr.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/muhammad-ali-and-the-first-amendment" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.firstamendmentcenter.org/muhammad-ali-and-the-first-amendment?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/muhammad-ali-played-key-role-in-unfolding-of-modern-first-amendment-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gap claims Kardashians too tarnished to suffer defamation</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/gap-claims-kardashians-too-tarnished-to-suffer-defamation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/gap-claims-kardashians-too-tarnished-to-suffer-defamation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 19:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kardashians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel-proof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q score]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
In defending themselves from a Kardashian lawsuitover the use of a double in an ad mocking the Kardashian lifestyle, the Gap is contending that the Kardashians have no reputation left to protect, that  they have already sought so much negative publicity that they are libel-proof. The Kardashians are asking for $15-20 million in damages. -db [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>In defending themselves from a Kardashian lawsuitover the use of a double in an ad mocking the Kardashian lifestyle, the Gap is contending that the Kardashians have no reputation left to protect, that  they have already sought so much negative publicity that they are libel-proof.</p>
<p>The Kardashians are asking for $15-20 million in damages. -db</p>
<p>From <strong><em>Fox News</em></strong>, January 20 2012, by Jo Piazza.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2012/01/20/kardashian-lawsuit-saying-gap-tarnished-their-reputation-will-be-hard-to-win/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2012/01/20/kardashian-lawsuit-saying-gap-tarnished-their-reputation-will-be-hard-to-win/?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/gap-claims-kardashians-too-tarnished-to-suffer-defamation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate majority leader stalls Internet piracy legislation</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/senate-majority-leader-stalls-internet-piracy-legislation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/senate-majority-leader-stalls-internet-piracy-legislation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online piracy laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pipa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
In a victory for the technology industry, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid postponed a vote on the Protect IP Act, the online piracy bill before the Senate. In effect, Congress is going back to the drawing board to balance intellectual property rights with openness and innovation on the Internet. -db From Wired, January 20, 2012, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>In a victory for the technology industry, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid postponed a vote on the Protect IP Act, the online piracy bill before the Senate.</p>
<p>In effect, Congress is going back to the drawing board to balance intellectual property rights with openness and innovation on the Internet. -db</p>
<p>From <strong><em>Wired</em></strong>, January 20, 2012, by David Kravets.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/01/pipa-vote-delayed/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/01/pipa-vote-delayed/?referer=');">Full story</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/senate-majority-leader-stalls-internet-piracy-legislation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appeal in the works in Twitter/WikiLeaks case</title>
		<link>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/appeal-in-the-works-in-twitterwikileaks-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/appeal-in-the-works-in-twitterwikileaks-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech / Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EFF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secrecy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=19064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
The American Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Frontier Foundation are set to file an appeal concerning the U.S. government&#8217;s attempts to obtain Twitter records in their investigation of WikiLeaks. The ACLU and EFF are seeking to prevent the government from sealing records of their efforts to obtain private information of Internet users without a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p>The <em>American Civil Liberties Union</em> and the <em>Electronic Frontier Foundation</em> are set to file an appeal concerning the U.S. government&#8217;s attempts to obtain Twitter records in their investigation of WikiLeaks.</p>
<p>The ACLU and EFF are seeking to prevent the government from sealing records of their efforts to obtain private information of Internet users without a warrant. -db</p>
<p>From a press release by the <strong><em>Electronic Frontier Foundation</em></strong>, January 20, 2012.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.eff.org/press/releases/aclu-eff-appeal-secrecy-ruling-twitterwikileaks-case" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.eff.org/press/releases/aclu-eff-appeal-secrecy-ruling-twitterwikileaks-case?referer=');">Full release</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firstamendmentcoalition.org/2012/01/appeal-in-the-works-in-twitterwikileaks-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

