Saturday, February 11, 2012

Subscribe to First Amendment CoalitionNews Feed     |     用中文     |     Español

Supreme Court delays broadcast of California same-sex marriage trial

The federal trial on California’s same-sex marriage ban will open Monday without cameras so that the U.S. Supreme Court has enough time to consider whether to allow the taping of the trial. The court’s order will be in effect until Wednesday, January 13. -DB

First Amendment Center
January 11, 2010
By Mark Sherman

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Supreme Court is blocking a broadcast of the trial on California’s same-sex marriage ban, at least for the first few days.

The federal trial is scheduled to begin later today in San Francisco. It will consider whether the Proposition 8 gay-marriage ban approved by California voters in November 2008 is legal.

The high court said today it would not allow video of the trial to be posted on YouTube.com, even with a delay, until the justices had more time to consider the issue. It said that today’s order would be in place at least until Jan. 13.

Opponents of the broadcast say they fear witness testimony might be affected if cameras are present.

Justice Stephen Breyer said he would have allowed cameras while the Court considers the matter.

Acting less than two hours before the trial’s scheduled start, the justices said they also would not permit real-time streaming that would have allowed the trial to be seen in other federal courthouses.

The Supreme Court’s consideration of the airing of the gay-marriage trial is set against the backdrop of the Court’s own strong resistance to cameras.

Some justices might believe that their opposition to cameras inside the Supreme Court could be undermined if they were to allow YouTube posts of the California trial.

The federal judiciary, led by Chief Justice John Roberts, has long opposed cameras in the courtroom as harmful to a fair proceeding.

Several justices, including most recently Justice Sonia Sotomayor, have said they are open to allowing cameras, but others have been adamantly opposed.

Copyright 2010 First Amendment Center
Copyright 2010 The Associated Press

Leave a Reply

captcha service