AG Opinion 05-1004
June 13, 2009 by admin
Filed under AG Opinions
Pat & Rowland Rebele
Raymond Pryke
CS Fund
McCormick Foundation
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Central Valley Foundation
Susan McClatchy
Allen McCombs
Copyright © 2012 · All Rights Reserved · Lifestyle theme by StudioPress · Powered by WordPress · Log in

This was a very useful opinion, but additional breadth is needed.
The opinion did not cover conceptual architectural plans and site plans.
Note: Conceptual architectural plans are not the final plans which are protected by US Copyright laws, but are those plans submitted to a city or county planning department with the application.
Our city denies residents from obtaining copies, or taking pictures of, conceptual architectural plans and site plans, thus limiting the ability to make informed comments or criticisms of an application prior to approval.
Similarly, at a planning commission meeting, the applicant is able to show his plan, but opposition cannot show an altered plan that is better suited.